Advertisement

Business Process Models as a Showcase for Syntax-Based Assistance in Diagram Editors

  • Steffen Mazanek
  • Mark Minas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5795)

Abstract

Recently, a generic approach for syntax-based user assistance in diagram editors has been proposed that requires the syntax of the visual language to be defined by a graph grammar. The present paper describes how this approach can be applied to the language of business process models (BPMs), which is widely used nowadays. The resulting BPM editor provides the following assistance features: combination or completion of BPM fragments, generation of BPM examples, an extensive set of correctness-preserving editing operations for BPMs, and auto-link, i.e., the automatic connection of activities by sequence flow.

Furthermore, this paper contains a discussion of the scalability and scope of the used approach. This also comprises a characterization of the languages where it can be put to a good use.

Keywords

Diagram editor syntax-based assistance graph parsing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.P.: Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling Full Code Generation. Wiley-IEEE Computer Society (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gronback, R.C.: Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Toolkit. Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Lara, J., Vangheluwe, H., Alfonseca, M.: Meta-modelling and graph grammars for multi-paradigm modelling in AToM3. Softw. and Syst. Modeling, 193–209 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu, N., Grundy, J., Hosking, J., Liu, N., Cao, S., Mehra, A.: Pounamu: A meta-tool for exploratory domain-specific visual language tool development. Systems and Software 80(8), 1390–1407 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Minas, M.: Concepts and realization of a diagram editor generator based on hypergraph transformation. Science of Computer Programming 44(2), 157–180 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mazanek, S., Maier, S., Minas, M.: An algorithm for hypergraph completion according to hyperedge replacement grammars. In: Ehrig, H., Heckel, R., Rozenberg, G., Taentzer, G. (eds.) ICGT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5214, pp. 39–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mazanek, S., Maier, S., Minas, M.: Auto-completion for diagram editors based on graph grammars. In: Proc. of the 2008 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, pp. 242–245. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mazanek, S., Minas, M.: Generating correctness-preserving editing operations for diagram editors. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques. Electronic Communications of the EASST, vol. 18. European Association of Software Science and Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mazanek, S., Minas, M.: Contraction of unconnected diagrams using least cost parsing. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques. Electronic Communications of the EASST, vol. 18. European Association of Software Science and Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Object Management Group: Business Process Modeling Notation, BPMN (2009), http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/09-01-03.pdf
  11. 11.
    Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: What business process modelers can learn from programmers. Science of Computer Programming 65(1), 4–13 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gschwind, T., Koehler, J., Wong, J.: Applying patterns during business process modeling. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 4–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drewes, F., Habel, A., Kreowski, H.J.: Hyperedge replacement graph grammars. In: Rozenberg, G. (ed.) Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation. Foundations, vol. I, pp. 95–162. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reps, T.W., Teitelbaum, T.: The Synthesizer Generator: A System for Constructing Language-Based Editors. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horgan, J.R., Moore, D.J.: Techniques for improving language-based editors. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 9(3), 7–14 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nilsson-Nyman, E., Ekman, T., Hedin, G.: Practical scope recovery using bridge parsing. In: Gašević, D., Lāmmel, R., Van Wyk, E. (eds.) Proc. of the First Int. Conf. on Software Language Engineering. LNCS, vol. 5452, pp. 95–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tolvanen, J.P.: How to support language users? (2008), http://www.metacase.com/blogs/jpt/blogView?entry=3405240161 (accessed July-09-2009)
  18. 18.
    Sen, S., Baudry, B., Vangheluwe, H.: Domain-specific model editors with model completion. In: Giese, H. (ed.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5002, pp. 259–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hessellund, A., Czarnecki, K., Wasowski, A.: Guided development with multiple domain-specific languages. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 46–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    White, J., Schmidt, D.C., Nechypurenko, A., Wuchner, E.: Model intelligence: an approach to modeling guidance. UPGRADE 9(2), 22–28 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blanc, X., Mounier, I., Mougenot, A., Mens, T.: Detecting model inconsistency through operation-based model construction. In: Proc. of the 30th Int. Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 511–520. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ehrig, K., Küster, J.M., Taentzer, G.: Generating instance models from meta models. Software and Systems Modeling (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hornung, T., Koschmider, A., Lausen, G.: Recommendation based process modeling support: Method and user experience. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 265–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Koehler, J.: The refined process structure tree. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 100–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steffen Mazanek
    • 1
  • Mark Minas
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität der Bundeswehr MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations