Advertisement

Formalising a Model for Digital Rights Clearance

  • Claudio Prandoni
  • Marlis Valentini
  • Martin Doerr
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5714)

Abstract

Due to the increasing complexity and world-wide distribution of digital objects, identification and enforcement of digital rights have become too complex to be carried out manually. It is necessary to take into account the case-specific applicable laws, the complete creation history of a work and the existing licenses. However, no formal generic model has been presented so far integrating these aspects. This paper presents an innovative domain ontology of the Intellectual Property Rights. It distinguishes four levels of abstraction or control: (1) the legal framework, (2) the individual rights people hold, (3) the individual usage agreements right holders and others may issue, and (4) the particular actions that are restricted by IPR regulations or bring particular rights into existence. The ontology has the potential to enable wide semantic interoperability of digital repositories for identifying existing rights on digital objects and tracing the impact of particular actions on rights and regulations.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Rights Digital Provenance Digital Rights Information Integration Interoperability Ontology Domain Models Ontology Engineering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Delgado, J., Gallego, I., Llorente, S., García, R.: IPROnto: An Ontology for Digital Rights Management. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. 16th Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2003, vol. 106, pp. 111–120. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003), http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j03-12.pdf Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nadah, N., Dulong de Rosnay, M., Bachimont, B.: Licensing digital content with a generic ontology: escaping from the jungle of rights expression languages. In: International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 65–69 (June 2007), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1276318.1276330
  3. 3.
    Coyle, K.: Rights expression languages - a report for the library of congress (February 2004), http://www.loc.gov/standards/relreport.pdf
  4. 4.
    Doerr M., Bekiari C.: FRBRoo, a Conceptual Model for Performing Arts. In: 2008 Annual Conference of CIDOC, Athens (September 2008), http://www.cidoc2008.gr/cidoc/Documents/papers/drfile.2008-06-18.1838425657
  5. 5.
    Multimedia Description Schemes (MDS) Group: Introducing MPEG-21 REL - an Overview. International Organization for Standardization (July 2005), http://www.chiariglione.org/MPEG/technologies/mp21-rel/index.htm
  6. 6.
    Iannella, R.: Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) Specification. Version 1.1 (August 2002), http://odrl.net/1.1/ODRL-11.pdf
  7. 7.
    Logos and codes for the CC core licenses, http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Overview of ccREL vocabulary (RDF Schema), http://creativecommons.org/schema.rdf
  10. 10.
    Definition of Copyleft licensing, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft
  11. 11.
    García, R.: A Semantic Web Approach to Digital Rights Management. PhD Thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona (2005), http://rhizomik.net/~roberto/thesis/
  12. 12.
    García, R., Gil, R., Delgado, J.: A web ontologies framework for digital rights management. In: Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol. 15(2), pp. 137–154. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bide, M., Rust, G.: The <indecs> metadata framework: Principles, model and data dictionary. Godfrey Rust, MUZE Inc., Mark Bide, EDItEUR (June 2000), http://www.doi.org/topics/indecs/indecs_framework_2000.pdf
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Doerr, M.: The CIDOC CRM – An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI Magazine 24(3) (2003), http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/ontological_approach.pdf
  16. 16.
    CIDOC CRM Web Site, http://www.cidoc-crm.org
  17. 17.
    Doerr, M., Le Bœuf, P., Bekiari, C. (eds.): International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation: FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping to FRBR ER (version 0.9 draft) (January 2008), http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/frbr_oo/frbr_docs/FRBR_oo_V0.9.pdf
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Le Bœuf, P.: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): Hype or Cure-All? Haworth Information Press Inc. (2005) ISBN: 0789027984Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Doerr, M., Hunter, J., Lagoze, C.: Towards a Core Ontology for Information Integration. Journal of Digital Information 4(1) Article No. 169 (April 2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith, B.: Ontology: An Introduction. In: Floridi, L. (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, pp. 155–166. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    CASPAR project Web Site, http://www.casparpreserves.eu
  24. 24.
    CASPAR software, documentation and code, http://developers.casparpreserves.eu:8080/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio Prandoni
    • 1
  • Marlis Valentini
    • 1
  • Martin Doerr
    • 2
  1. 1.Metaware S.p.A.PisaItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Computer Science, FORTH, Vassilika VoutonHeraklionGreece

Personalised recommendations