Assessing Voters’ Attitudes towards Electronic Voting in Latin America: Evidence from Colombia’s 2007 E-Voting Pilot

  • R. Michael Alvarez
  • Gabriel Katz
  • Ricardo Llamosa
  • Hugo E. Martinez
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5767)


Electronic voting could increase citizens’ electoral participation and trust in countries characterized by fragile democratic institutions and public discredit of the political system such as those in Latin America. This paper examines attitudes towards e-voting among participants in a large scale pilot project conducted in Colombia in 2007, focusing on the perceived reliability and usability of different automated voting technologies. Using a multivariate probit model, we determine the effect of socio-demographic, geographic and technical factors on users’ evaluations of electronic voting vis a vis the traditional paper ballot system. Our results show that users find e-voting not only easier than the current voting system, but also substantially more reliable. While voters’ opinions on usability are driven by technical issues, their trust in the new technologies is strongly affected by individual characteristics. We conclude that e-voting entails a promising opportunity to empower voters and increase confidence in elections in Colombia.


e-voting pilot Latin America multivariate probit reliability usability trust in government voter confidence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Agresti, A.: Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alvarez, R.M., Hall, T.E.: Point, Click and Vote: The Future of Internet Voting. Brookings Institution Press, Washington (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alvarez, R.M., Hall, T.E.: Electronic Elections: The Perils and Promises of Digital Democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ansolabehere, S., Stewart, C.: Residual Votes Attributable to Technology. Journal of Politics 67, 365–389 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Avgerou, C., Ganzaroli, A., Poulymenakou, A., Reinhard, N.: ICT and citizens’ trust in government: lessons from electronic voting in Brazil. In: Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Social implications of Computers in Developing countries, Sao Paulo (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barrat, J.: A preliminary question: Is e-voting actually useful for our democratic institutions? What do we need it for? In: Electronic Voting 2006, pp. 51–60. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braun, N., Brandli, D.: Swiss E-Voting Pilot Projects: Evaluation, Situation Analysis and How to Proceed. In: Electronic Voting 2006, pp. 51–60. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calvo, E., Escolar, M., Pomares, J.S.: Ballot Design and Split Ticket Voting in Multiparty Systems: experimental evidence on information effects and vote choice. Electoral Studies 28, 218–231 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Card, D., Moretti, E.: Does Voting Technology Affect Election Outcomes? Touch-screen Voting and the 2004 Presidential Election. Review of Economics and Statistics 89, 660–673 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cappellari, L., Jenkins, S.P.: Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. The Stata Journal 3, 278–294 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carter, L., Belanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal 15, 5–25 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chib, S., Greenberg, E.: Analysis of multivariate probit models. Biometrika 85, 347–361 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived ease of Use, and User acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Everett, S.P., Greene, K.K., Byrne, M.D., Wallach, D.S., Derr, K., Sandler, D., Torous, T.: Electronic Voting Machines versus Traditional Methods: Improved Preference, Similar Performance. In: CHI Proceedings - Measuring, Business and Voting, Florence, Italy (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gelman, A., Hill, J.: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hansen, B.B., Bowers, J.: Covariate Balance in Simple,Stratified and Clustered Comparative Studies. Statistical Science 23, 219–236 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herron, M., Wand, J.N.: Assessing partisan bias in voting technology: The case of the 2004 New Hampshire recount. Electoral Studies 26, 247–261 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herrnson, P.S., Niemi, R.G., Hanmer, M.J., Bederson, B.B., Conrad, F.C.: Voting Technology: The Not-So-Simple Act of Casting a Ballot. Brookings Institution Press, Washington (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kohno, T., Stubblefield, A., Rubin, A.D., Wallach, D.S.: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, California (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Latinbarometro: Una década de mediciones. Corporación Latinbarómetro, Santiago de Chile (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Limongi, F.: Reformas Institucionais, Participacao, Competicao e Inclusao Politica. USP, Sao Paulo (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    List, L.A.: Field Experiments: A Bridge between Lab and Naturally Occurring Data. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy 6(2) (2006), Article 8Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McGaley, M., Gibson, J.P.: Electronic Voting: A Safety Critical System (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Milkota, K.: E-democracy conference: a summary of findings. EVE conference, Paris (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oostveen, A.M., van den Besselaar, P.: Security as belief: User perceptions of the security of electronic voting systems. In: Prosser, A., Krimmer, R. (eds.) Electronic Voting in Europe: Technology, Law, Politics and Society. Lecture Notes in Informatics, vol. P-47, pp. 88–97. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oostveen, A.M., van den Besselaar, P.: Trust, Identity and the Effects of Voting Technologies on Voting Behavior. Social Science Computer Review 23, 304–311 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rezende, P.A.: Electronic Voting Systems - Is Brazil ahead of its time? First Workshop on Voter-Verifiable Election Systems Denver (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rodrigues-Filho, J., Alexander, C.J., Batista, L.C.: E-Voting in Brazil, - The Risks to Democracy. In: Electronic Voting 2006, pp. 85–94. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stein, R., Vonnahme, G., Byrne, M., Wallach, D.S.: Voting Technology, Election Administration and Voter Performance. Election Law Journal 7, 123–135 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tornatzky, L.G., Klein, R.J.: Innovation characteristics and Innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 29, 28–45 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tomz, M., Van Houweling, R.P.: How Does Voting Equipment Affect the Racial Gap in Voided Ballots? American Journal of Political Science 47, 46–60 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    UNDP: Democracy in Latin America: Towards a citizens’ democracy. United Nations Development Programme, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Universidad de los Andes: Colombia. Giro hacia la derecha? Technical Report, Observatorio para la Democracia. Universidad de los Andes, Bogota (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    van den Besselaar, P., Oostveen, A.M., De Cindio, F., Ferrazzi, D.: Experiments with e-voting technology: experiences and lessons. In: Cunningham, P., et al. (eds.) Building the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Cases Studies. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Michael Alvarez
    • 1
  • Gabriel Katz
    • 1
  • Ricardo Llamosa
    • 2
  • Hugo E. Martinez
    • 2
  1. 1.DHSS, DHSS 228-77California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.CIDLISUniversidad Industrial de SantanderColombia

Personalised recommendations