Junior: The Stanford Entry in the Urban Challenge

  • Michael Montemerlo
  • Jan Becker
  • Suhrid Bhat
  • Hendrik Dahlkamp
  • Dmitri Dolgov
  • Scott Ettinger
  • Dirk Haehnel
  • Tim Hilden
  • Gabe Hoffmann
  • Burkhard Huhnke
  • Doug Johnston
  • Stefan Klumpp
  • Dirk Langer
  • Anthony Levandowski
  • Jesse Levinson
  • Julien Marcil
  • David Orenstein
  • Johannes Paefgen
  • Isaac Penny
  • Anna Petrovskaya
  • Mike Pflueger
  • Ganymed Stanek
  • David Stavens
  • Antone Vogt
  • Sebastian Thrun
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 56)

Abstract

This article presents the architecture of Junior, a robotic vehicle capable of navigating urban environments autonomously. In doing so, the vehicle is able to select its own routes, perceive and interact with other traffic, and execute various urban driving skills including lane changes, U-turns, parking, and merging into moving traffic. The vehicle successfully finished and won second place in the DARPA Urban Challenge, a robot competition organized by the U.S. Government.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buehler, M., Iagnemma, K., Singh, S. (eds.): The 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge: The Great Robot Race. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  2. DARPA, Urban challenge rules (2007), http://www.darpa.mil/grandchallenge/rules.asp (revision october 27, 2007)
  3. Ferguson, D., Stentz, A.: Field D*: An interpolation-based path planner and replanner. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium of Robotics Research (ISRR 2005), San Francisco, CA. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  4. Howard, R.A.: Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes. MIT Press and Wiley (1960)Google Scholar
  5. Jazwinsky, A.: Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory. Academic, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  6. Montemerlo, M., Thrun, S., Dahlkamp, H., Stavens, D., Strohband, S.: Winning the DARPA Grand Challenge with an AI robot. In: Proceedings of the AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston, MA. AAAI, Menlo Park (2006)Google Scholar
  7. Moravec, H.P.: Sensor fusion in certainty grids for mobile robots. AI Magazine 9(2), 61–74 (1988)Google Scholar
  8. Simmons, R., Apfelbaum, D.: A task description language for robot control. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Victoria, CA (1998)Google Scholar
  9. Urmson, C., Anhalt, J., Clark, M., Galatali, T., Gonzalez, J., Gowdy, J., Gutierrez, A., Harbaugh, S., Johnson-Roberson, M., Kato, H., Koon, P., Peterson, K., Smith, B., Spiker, S., Tryzelaar, E., Whittaker, W.: High speed navigation of unrehearsed terrain: Red Team technology for the Grand Challenge, Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-04-37, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2004)Google Scholar
  10. U.S. Department of Transportation, B. o. T. S. (2005); Transportation statistics annual reportGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Montemerlo
    • 1
  • Jan Becker
    • 4
  • Suhrid Bhat
    • 2
  • Hendrik Dahlkamp
    • 1
  • Dmitri Dolgov
    • 1
  • Scott Ettinger
    • 3
  • Dirk Haehnel
    • 1
  • Tim Hilden
    • 2
  • Gabe Hoffmann
    • 1
  • Burkhard Huhnke
    • 2
  • Doug Johnston
    • 1
  • Stefan Klumpp
    • 2
  • Dirk Langer
    • 2
  • Anthony Levandowski
    • 1
  • Jesse Levinson
    • 1
  • Julien Marcil
    • 2
  • David Orenstein
    • 1
  • Johannes Paefgen
    • 1
  • Isaac Penny
    • 1
  • Anna Petrovskaya
    • 1
  • Mike Pflueger
    • 2
  • Ganymed Stanek
    • 2
  • David Stavens
    • 1
  • Antone Vogt
    • 1
  • Sebastian Thrun
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford Artificial Intelligence LabStanford UniversityStanford
  2. 2.Electronics Research LabVolkswagen of AmericaPalo Alto
  3. 3.Intel ResearchSanta Clara
  4. 4.Robert Bosch LLCResearch and Technology CenterPalo Alto

Personalised recommendations