Safety Aspects in a Human-Robot Interaction Scenario: A Human Worker Is Co-operating with an Industrial Robot
This paper presents a concept of a smart working environment designed to allow true joint actions of humans and industrial robots. The proposed system perceives its environment with multiple sensor modalities and acts in it with an industrial robot manipulator to assemble workpieces in combination with a human worker. In combination with the reactive behavior of the robot, safe collaboration between the human and the robot is possible. Generally, the application scenario is situated in a factory, where a human worker is supported by a robot to accomplish a given hybrid assembly scenario, that covers manual and automated assembly steps. For an effective human-robot collaboration, new safety methods have to be developed and proven. Human workers as well as objects in the environment have to be detected and a collision avoidance algorithm has to ensure the safety for persons and equipment.
KeywordsHuman-Robot Co-operation Industrial Robot Safety System
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.EN ISO 10218-1 (2006): Robots for industrial environments - Safety requirements - Part 1: Robot; Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany (2006)Google Scholar
- 2.Bischoff, R., Schmirgel, V., Suppa, M.: The SME Worker’s Third Hand. SMErobot project, Germany (2008), http://www.smerobot.org/index.php
- 3.Haegele, M., Helms, E.: rob@work: der Assistent der Zukunft - Mobile Assistenzroboter in der industriellen Fertigung. Fraunhofer IPA, Stuttgart, Germany (2004), http://www.ipa.fraunhofer.de/Arbeitsgebiete/robotersysteme
- 4.Parlitz, C., Meyer, C.: PowerMate – Schrankenlose Mensch-Roboter-Kooperation. Fraunhofer IPA, Stuttgart, Germany (2005), http://www.ipa.fraunhofer.de/Arbeitsgebiete/robotersysteme
- 5.Zaeh, M.F., Lau, C., Wiesbeck, M., Ostgathe, M., Vogl, W.: Towards the Cognitive Factory. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV), Toronto, Canada (July 2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Marble, J.L., Bruemmer, D.J., Few, D.A., Dudenhoeffer, D.D.: Evaluation of supervisory vs. peer-peer interaction with humanrobot teams. In: HICSS 2004: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2004) - Track 5, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
- 8.Knoblich, G., Jordan, J.S.: Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control 29(5), 1006–1016 (2003)Google Scholar
- 9.EN ISO 10218-2 (2008): Robots for industrial environments - Safety requirements - Part 2: Robot system and integration; Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
- 10.Lenz, C., Nair, S., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., Roesel, W., Bannat, A., Gast, J., Wallhoff, F.: Joint Actions for Humans and Industrial Robots: A Hybrid Assembly Concept. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE RO-MAN 2008), Munich, Germany (August 2008)Google Scholar