Feature Extraction and Selection from Vibration Measurements for Structural Health Monitoring

  • Janne Toivola
  • Jaakko Hollmén
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5772)

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) aims at monitoring buildings or other structures and assessing their condition, alerting about new defects in the structure when necessary. For instance, vibration measurements can be used for monitoring the condition of a bridge. We investigate the problem of extracting features from lightweight wireless acceleration sensors. On-line algorithms for frequency domain monitoring are considered, and the resulting features are combined to form a large bank of candidate features. We explore the feature space by selecting random sets of features and estimating probabilistic classifiers for damage detection purposes. We assess the relevance of the features in a large population of classifiers. The methods are assessed with real-life data from a wooden bridge model, where structural problems are simulated with small added weights.

Keywords

structural health monitoring damage detection feature extraction feature selection wireless sensor network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Information Science and Statistics. Springer, New York (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Couch, I., Leon, W.: Digital and analog communication systems. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 365, 303–315 (2007); Published online December 12, 2006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goertzel, G.: An algorithm for evaluation of finite trigonometric series. American Mathematical Monthly 65, 34–35 (1958)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A.: An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3(1), 1157–1182 (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kullaa, J.: Elimination of environmental influences from damage-sensitive features in a structural health monitoring system. In: Balageas, D.L. (ed.) Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2002, pp. 742–749. DEStech Publications Inc., Onera (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynch, J.P., Sundararajan, A., Law, K.H., Kiremidjian, A.S., Carryer, E.: Embedding damage detection algorithms in a wireless sensing unit for operational power efficiency. Smart Materials and Structures 13(4), 800–810 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitra, S.K.: Digital Signal Processing: A Computer-Based Approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Proakis, J.G., Salehi, M.: Digital communications. McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swets, J.A.: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240(4857), 1285–1293 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K.: Pattern Recognition. Elsevier, San Diego (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, W., Gao, Z., Huang, L., Yao, Y.: Spectrum sensing based on Goertzel algorithm. In: 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2008. WiCOM 2008, October 2008, pp. 1–4 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janne Toivola
    • 1
  • Jaakko Hollmén
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computer ScienceHelsinki University of TechnologyEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations