Advertisement

Control Strategies for the Regulation of the Eukaryotic Heat Shock Response

  • Elena Czeizler
  • Eugen Czeizler
  • Ralph-Johan Back
  • Ion Petre
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5688)

Abstract

Elevated temperatures cause proteins in living cells to misfold. They start forming larger and larger aggregates that can eventually lead to the cell’s death. The heat shock response is an evolutionary well conserved cellular response to massive protein misfolding and it is driven by the need to keep the level of misfolded proteins under control. We consider in this paper a recently proposed new molecular model for the heat shock response in eukaryotes, consisting of a temperature-induced activation mechanism, chaperoning of misfolded proteins and self-regulation of the chaperon synthesis. We take in this paper a control driven approach to studying this regulatory network. We modularize the network by identifying its main functional modules. We distinguish three main feedback loops. The main question we are addressing is why is this level of complexity needed for implementing what could in principle also be achieved with an open-loop design. We answer the question by comparing the numerical behavior of various knockdown mutants where one or more feedback loops are missing. We also discuss a new approach for a biologically-unbiased model comparison.

Keywords

Heat Shock Reference Model Misfolded Protein Heat Shock Response Heat Shock Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alves, R., Savageau, M.A.: Extending the method of mathematically controlled comparison to include numerical comparisons. Bioinformatics 16, 786–798 (2000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, W.W., Schoeberl, B., Jasper, P.J., Niepel, M., Nielsen, U.B., Lauffenburger, D.A., Sorger, P.K.: Input output behavior of ErbB signaling pathways as revealed by a mass action model trained against dynamic data. Molecular Systems Biology 5, 239Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Csete, M.E., Doyle, J.C.: Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity. Science 295, 1664–1669 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guldberg, C.M., Waage, P.: Studies Concerning Affinity. C. M. Forhandlinger: Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiana 35 (1864)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guldberg, C.M., Waage, P.: Concerning Chemical Affinity. Erdmann’s Journal für Practische Chemie 127, 69–114 (1879)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hawkins, B.A., Cornell, H.V. (eds.): Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitano, H.: Systems biology: A brief overview. Science 295, 1662–1664 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holmberg, C.I., Tran, S.E., Eriksson, J.E., Sistonen, L.: Multisite phosphorylation provides sophisticated regulation of transcription factors. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27(12), 619–627 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kline, M.P., Morimoto, R.I.: Repression of the heat shock factor 1 transcriptional activation domain is modulated by constitutive phosphorylation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 17(4), 2107–2115 (1997)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lazebnik, Y.: Can a biologist fix a radio? - or what I learned while studying apoptosis. Cancer Cell 2, 179–182 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petre, I., Mizera, A., Hyder, C.L., Mikhailov, A., Eriksson, J.E., Sistonen, L., Back, R.-J.: A new mathematical model for the heat shock response. In: Kok, J. (ed.) Algorithmic bioprocesses. Natural Computing. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petre, I., Hyder, C.L., Mizera, A., Mikhailov, A., Eriksson, J.E., Sistonen, L., Back, R.-J.: A simple mathematical model for the eukaryotic heat shock response (submitted, 2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    El Samad, H., Kurata, H., Doyle, J.C., Gross, C.A., Khammash, M.: Surviving heat shock: Control strategies for robustness and performance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(8), 2736–2741 (2005)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sontag, E.: Some new directions in control theory inspired by systems biology. IEEE Systems Biology 1(1), 9–18 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sontag, E.: Molecular systems biology and control. European Journal of Control 11, 396–435 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stelling, J., Sauer, U., Szallasi, Z., Doyle, F.J., Doyle, J.: Robustness of cellular functions. Cell 118(6), 675–685 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wolkenhauer, O.: Systems biology: the reincarnation of systems theory applied in biology? Brief Bioinform 2(3), 258–270 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Czeizler
    • 1
  • Eugen Czeizler
    • 1
  • Ralph-Johan Back
    • 1
  • Ion Petre
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ITÅbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations