Advertisement

Global Context Extraction for Object Recognition Using a Combination of Range and Visual Features

  • Michael Kemmler
  • Erik Rodner
  • Joachim Denzler
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5742)

Abstract

It has been highlighted by many researchers, that the use of context information as an additional cue for high-level object recognition is important to close the gap between human and computer vision. We present an approach to context extraction in the form of global features for place recognition. Based on an uncalibrated combination of range data of a time-of-flight (ToF) camera and images obtained from a visual sensor, our system is able to classify the environment in predefined places (e.g. kitchen, corridor, office) by representing the sensor data with various global features. Besides state-of-the-art feature types, such as power spectrum models and Gabor filters, we introduce histograms of surface normals as a new representation of range images. An evaluation with different classifiers shows the potential of range data from a ToF camera as an additional cue for this task.

Keywords

Support Vector Machine Hide Markov Model Mobile Robot Object Recognition Recognition Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lange, R.: 3D Time-of-Flight Distance Measurement with Custom Solid-State Image Sensors in CMOS/CCD-Technology. PhD thesis, University of Siegen (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prusak, A., Melnychuk, O., Roth, H., Schiller, I., Koch, R.: Pose estimation and map building with a time-of-flight camera for robot navigation. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl. 5, 355–364 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hegazy, D., Denzler, J.: Generic 3d object recognition from time-of-flight images using boosted combined shape features. In: Proc. of VISAPP, pp. 321–326 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Torralba, A., Murphy, K.P., Freeman, W.T., Rubin, M.A.: Context-based vision system for place and object recognition. In: Proc. of ICCV, pp. 273–280 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., Ponce, J.: Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In: Proc. of CVPR, pp. 2169–2178 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murray, D.R.: Patchlets: a method of interpreting correlation stereo three-dimensional data. PhD thesis, The University of British Columbia, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hetzel, G., Leibe, B., Levi, P., Schiele, B.: 3D object recognition from range images using local feature histograms. In: Proc. of CVPR, vol. 2, pp. 394–399 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mezrich, J., Carlson, C., Cohen, R.: Image descriptors for displays. Technical Report PRRL-77-CR-7, Office of Naval Research (1977)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. IJCV 42, 145–175 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Redies, C., Hasenstein, J., Denzler, J.: Fractal-like image statistics in visual art: similarity to natural scenes. Spatial Vision 21, 137–148 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torralba, A.: Contextual priming for object detection. International Journal of Computer Vision 53, 169–191 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wainwright, M.J., Schwartz, O., Simoncelli, E.P.: Natural image statistics and divisive normalization: Modeling nonlinearity and adaptation in cortical neurons. In: Rao, R., Olshausen, B., Lewicki, M. (eds.) Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function, pp. 203–222. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics), 1st edn., Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schimek, M.G.: Smoothing and Regression: Approaches, Computation, and Application. Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, Chichester (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 5–32 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geurts, P., Ernst, D., Wehenkel, L.: Extremely randomized trees. Maching Learning 63, 3–42 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Platt, J.: Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparison to regularize likelihood methods. In: Smola, A., Bartlett, P., Schoelkopf, B., Schuurmans, D. (eds.) Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pp. 61–74 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Kemmler
    • 1
  • Erik Rodner
    • 1
  • Joachim Denzler
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair for Computer VisionFriedrich Schiller University of JenaGermany

Personalised recommendations