Embedded Geometric Active Contour with Shape Constraint for Mass Segmentation
Mass boundary segmentation plays an important role in computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system. Since the shape and boundary are crucial discriminant features in CAD, the active contour methods are more competitive in mass segmentation. However, the general active contour methods are not so effective for some cases, because most masses possess very blurry margin that easily induce the contour leaking. To the end, this paper presents an improved geometric active contour for mass segmentation. It firstly introduces the morphological concentric layer model for automatically initializing. Then an embedded level set is used to extract the adaptive shape constraints. For refining the boundary, a new shape constraint function and stopping function are designed for the enhanced geometric active contour method. The proposed method is tested on real mammograms containing masses, and the results suggest that the proposed method could effectively restrain the contour leaking and get better segmented results than general active contour methods.
KeywordsMass segmentation active contour shape constraint embedded level set mammogram
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.American Cancer Society-Cancer facts and figures (2008), http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/008-CAFFfinalsecured.pdf
- 5.Timp, S., Karssemeijer, N.: A New 2D Segmentation Method Based on Dynamic Programming Applied to Computer Aided Detection in Mammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 31(5), 958–971 (2004)Google Scholar
- 6.Ball, J.E., Bruce, L.M.: Digital Mammogram Spiculated Mass Detection and Spicule Segmentation Using Level Sets. In: IEEE International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 4979–4984. IEEE Press, Lyon (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Ersoy, I., Bunyak, F., Palaniappan, K., Sun, M., Forgacs, G.: Cell Spreading Analysis with Directed Edge Profile-Guided Level Set Active Contours. In: Metaxas, D., Axel, L., Fichtinger, G., Székely, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5241, pp. 376–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Starck, J.L., Elad, M., Donoho, D.: Redundant Multiscale Transforms and Their Application for Morphological Component Analysis. Adv. Imag. Elect. Phys. 132, 287–348 (2004)Google Scholar
- 16.Li, C.M., Xu, C.Y., Gui, C.F., Fox, M.D.: Level Set Evolution Without Re-initialization: A New Variational Formulation. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 430–436. IEEE Press, San Diego (2005)Google Scholar
- 17.University of South Florida, Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM), http://marathon.csee.usf.edu/Mammography/Database.html