Advertisement

Database Technologies for RDF

  • Souripriya Das
  • Jagannathan Srinivasan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5689)

Abstract

Efficient and scalable support for RDF/OWL data storage, loading, inferencing and querying, in conjunction with already available support for enterprise level data and operations reliability requirements, can make databases suitable to act as enterprise-level RDF/OWL repository and hence become a viable platform for building semantic applications for the enterprise environments.

This tutorial outlines the requirements for supporting semantic technologies in databases including bulk load and data manipulation operations, inference based on RDFS, OWL and user-defined rules, and support for SPARQL queries. It also discusses the design choices for handling issues that arise in implementing support for storage and operations on large scale RDF/OWL data, and in general, touches upon the practical aspects related to RDF/OWL support that become important in enterprise environments. Semantic technologies support in Oracle Database is used as a case study to illustrate with concrete examples the key requirements and design issues.

Keywords

data characteristics storage architecture bulk load inference semantic query ontology-assisted query programming interface performance query hints indexing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Resource Description Framework (RDF), http://www.w3.org/RDF
  2. 2.
    RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema, W3C Recommendation (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema
  3. 3.
    OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref
  4. 4.
    Pellet: The Open Source OWL DL Reasoner, http://clarkparsia.com/pellet/
  5. 5.
    Guo, Y., Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems. J. Web Sem. 3(2-3), 158–182 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Chong, E.I., Souripriya Das, S., Eadon, G., Srinivasan, J.: An Efficient SQL-based RDF Querying Scheme. In: VLDB 2005, pp. 1216–1227 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chong, E.I., Das, S., Eadon, G., Srinivasan, J.: Supporting Keyword Columns with Ontology-based Referential Constraints in DBMS. In: ICDE 2006, p. 95 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    SPARQL query language for RDF, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query
  11. 11.
    Das, S., Chong, E.I., Wu, Z., Annamalai, M., Srinivasan, J.: A Scalable Scheme for Bulk Loading Large RDF Graphs into Oracle. In: ICDE 2008, pp. 1297–1306 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu, Z., Eadon, G., Das, S., Chong, E.I., Kolovski, V., Annamalai, M., Srinivasan, J.: Implementing an Inference Engine for RDFS/OWL Constructs and User-Defined Rules in Oracle. In: ICDE 2008, pp. 1239–1248 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jena – A Semantic Web Framework for Java, http://jena.sourceforge.net
  14. 14.
    Oracle Database Semantic Technologies, http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/semantic_technologies/
  15. 15.
    Advances in Virtuoso RDF Triple Storage (Bitmap Indexing), http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/wiki/main/Main/VOSBitmapIndexing
  16. 16.
    Sesame: RDF Schema Querying and Storage, http://www.openrdf.org/
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Weiss, C., Karras, P., Bernstein, A.: Hexastore: sextuple indexing for semantic web data management. In: VLDB, pp. 1008–1019 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abadi, D.J., Marcus, A., Madden, S., Hollenbach, K.J.: Scalable Semantic Web Data Management Using Vertical Partitioning. In: VLDB 2007, pp. 411–422 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alexaki, S., Christophides, V., Karvounarakis, G., Plexousakis, D., Karsten Tolle, K.: The ICS-FORTH RDFSuite: Managing Voluminous RDF Description Bases. In: SemWeb 2001 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stocker, M., Seaborne, A., Bernstein, A., Kiefer, C., Reynolds, D.: SPARQL basic graph pattern optimization using selectivity estimation. In: WWW 2008, pp. 595–604 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Theoharis, Y., Christophides, V., Karvounarakis, G.: Benchmarking Database Representations of RDF/S Stores. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 685–701. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Biron, P.V., Malhotra, A.: XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition W3C Recommendation. W3C (October 2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Bizer, C.: The D2RQ Platform - Treating Non-RDF Relational Databases as Virtual RDF Graphs, http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/d2rq/
  27. 27.
    Sahoo, S., Halb, W., Hellmann, S., Idehen, K., Thibodeau Jr., T., Auer, S., Sequeda, J.: A Survey of Current Approaches for Mapping of Relational Databases to RDF, http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/StateOfTheArt
  28. 28.
    Wilkinson, K., Craig Sayers, C., Kuno, H.A., Reynolds, D.: Efficient RDF Storage and Retrieval in Jena2. In: SWDB 2003, pp. 131–150 (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Srinivasan, J., Murthy, R., Sundara, S., Agarwal, N., DeFazio, S.: Extensible Indexing: A Framework for Integrating Domain-Specific Indexing into Oracle8i. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 91–100 (2000)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horst, H.J.: Completeness, Decidability and Complexity of Entailment for RDF Schema and A Semantic Extension Involving the OWL Vocabulary. J. Web Sem. 3(2-3), 79–115 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Profiles: W3C Working Draft (April 21, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-owl2-profiles-20090421/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Souripriya Das
    • 1
  • Jagannathan Srinivasan
    • 1
  1. 1.OracleNashuaUSA

Personalised recommendations