Advertisement

Context Aware Programmable Trackers for the Next Generation Internet

  • Pedro Sousa
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5733)

Abstract

This work introduces and proposes the concept of context aware programmable trackers for the next generation Internet. The proposed solution gives ground for the development of advanced applications based on the P2P paradigm and will foster collaborative efforts among several network entities (e.g. P2P applications and ISPs). The proposed concept of context aware programmable trackers allows that several peer selection strategies might be supported by a P2P tracker entity able to improve the peer selection decisions according with pre-defined objectives and external inputs provided by specific services. The flexible, adaptive and enhanced peer selection semantics that might be achieved by the proposed solution will contribute for devising novel P2P based services and business models for the future Internet.

Keywords

Overlay Network Network Level Internet Service Provider Collaborative Optimization External Entity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Lua, K., et al.: A survey and comparison of peer-to-peer overlay network schemes. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, pp. 72-93 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choen, B.: Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. In: Proc. 1st Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, Berkeley (June 2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Legout, A., et al.: Clustering and Sharing Incentives in BitTorrent Systems. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS 2007, San Diego, CA, USA, June 12-16 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bharambe, A.R., et al.: Analyzing and Improving a BitTorrent Networks Performance Mechanisms. In: IEEE INFOCOM (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karagiannis, T., et al.: Is p2p dying or just hiding? Globecom, Dallas USA (November 2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schulze, H., Mochalski, K.: Internet Study 2007: The Impact of P2P File Sharing, Voice over IP, Skype, Joost, Instant Messaging, One-Click Hosting and Media Streaming such as YouTube on the Internet, Tech. report (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keralapura, R., et al.: Can ISPs take the heat from overlay networks? In: Proc. of HotNets-III, San Diego, CA (November 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qiu, L., et al.: SelFIsh routing in Internet-like environments. In: Proc of SIGCOMM 2003, Karlsruhe, Germany (August 2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xie, H., et al.: P4P: explicit communications for cooperative control between P2P and network providers, http://www.dcia.info/documents/P4P_Overview.pdf
  10. 10.
    Xie, H., et al.: P4P: Provider Portal for Applications. In: SIGCOMM 2008, Seattle, Washington, USA, August 17-22 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shen, G., et al.: HPTP: Relieving the tension between ISPs and P2P. In: Proc. of IPTPS, Bellevue, WA (Feburary 2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spognardi, A., et al.: A Methodology for P2P File-Sharing Traffic Detection. In: Proc. Second International Workshop on Hot Topics in Peer-to-Peer Systems 2005 (HOT-P2P 2005), July 2005, pp. 52–61 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karagiannis, T., et al.: Should internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution? In: Proc. of the Internet Measurement Conf., Berkeley CA (October 2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Madhyastha, H.V., et al.: iPlane: An information plane for distributed services. In: Proc. of OSDI, Seattle, WA (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eger, K., et al.: Efficient Simulation of Large-Scale P2P Networks: Packet-level vs. Flow-level Simulations. In: 2nd Workshop on the Use of P2P, GRID and Agents for the Development of Content Networks, Monterey Bay, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simulation of BitTorrent Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Networks in ns-2, http://www.tu-harburg.de/et6/research/bittorrentsim/index.html
  17. 17.
    ns-2 (Network Simulator). Documentation, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  18. 18.
    Odlyzko, A.: Data networks are lightly utilized, and will stay that way. Review of Network Economics 2(3), 210–237 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Sousa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations