Advertisement

Interpersonal Privacy Management in Distributed Collaboration: Situational Characteristics and Interpretive Influences

  • Sameer Patil
  • Alfred Kobsa
  • Ajita John
  • Lynne S. Brotman
  • Doree Seligmann
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5727)

Abstract

To understand how collaborators reconcile the often conflicting needs of awareness and privacy, we studied a large software development project in a multinational corporation involving individuals at sites in the U.S. and India. We present a theoretical framework describing privacy management practices and their determinants that emerged from field visits, interviews, and questionnaire responses. The framework identifies five relevant situational characteristics: issue(s) under consideration, physical place(s) involved in interaction(s), temporal aspects, affordances and limitations presented by technology, and nature of relationships among parties. Each actor, in turn, interprets the situation based on several simultaneous influences: self, team, work site, organization, and cultural environment. This interpretation guides privacy management action(s). Past actions form a feedback loop refining and/or reinforcing the interpretive influences. The framework suggests that effective support for privacy management will require that designers follow a socio-technical approach incorporating a wider scope of situational and interpretive differences.

Keywords

Privacy Awareness Distributed collaboration Privacy management 

References

  1. 1.
    Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S.: Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction 15(2/3), 139–178 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herbsleb, J.D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T.A., Grinter, R.E.: An Empirical Study of Global Software Development: Distance and Speed. In: Proc. of ICSE 2001, Toronto, Canada, pp. 81–90. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pankoke-Babatz, U., Syri, A.: Collaborative Workspace for Time Deferred Electronic Cooperation. In: Proc. of GROUP 2003, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, pp. 187–196. ACM Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kraut, R., Egido, C., Galegher, J.: Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration. In: Proc. of CSCW 1988, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 1–12. ACM Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dourish, P., Bly, S.: Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group. In: Proc. of CHI 1992, Monterey, CA, USA, pp. 541–547. ACM Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, L.T., Hupfer, S., Ross, S., Patterson, J.: Jazzing up Eclipse with Collaborative Tools. In: Proc. of Eclipse 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA, pp. 45–49. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herbsleb, J.D., Atkins, D.L., Boyer, D.G., Handel, M., Finholt, T.A.: Introducing Instant Messaging And Chat In The Workplace. In: Proc. of CHI 2002,, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp. 171–178. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DiMicco, J., Millen, D.R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., Muller, M.: Motivations for Social Networking at Work. In: Proc. of CSCW 2008, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 711–720. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    FaceTime Communications: The Collaborative Internet: Usage Trends, End User Attitudes and IT Impact (2008) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muller, M.J., Raven, M.E., Kogan, S., Millen, D.R., Carey, K.: Introducing Chat into Business Organizations: Toward an Instant Messaging Maturity Model. In: Proc. of GROUP 2003, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, pp. 50–57. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    IBM: IBM Reaps Business Benefits and Major Cost Savings From Unified Communications and Collaboration (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hudson, S.E., Smith, I.: Techniques for Addressing Fundamental Privacy and Disruption Tradeoffs in Awareness Support Systems. In: Proc. of CSCW 1996, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 248–257. ACM Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patil, S., Kobsa, A.: Privacy Considerations in Awareness Systems: Designing with Privacy in Mind. In: Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., Mackay, W. (eds.) Awareness Systems: Advances in Theory, Methodology and Design. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, A., Girgensohn, A., Schlueter, K.: NYNEX Portholes: Initial User Reactions and Redesign Implications. In: Proc. of GROUP 1997, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 385–394. ACM Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patil, S., Kobsa, A.: Instant Messaging and Privacy. In: Proc. of HCI 2004, Leeds, UK, pp. 85–88 (2004), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~kobsa/papers/2004-HCI-kobsa.pdf
  16. 16.
    Calore, M.: Privacy Fears Shock Facebook. Wired News (September 2006), http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/09/71739
  17. 17.
    Adams, A.: Users’ Perception of Privacy in Multimedia Communication. In: Proc. of CHI 1999: Extended Abstracts, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 53–54. ACM Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adams, A., Sasse, M.A.: Privacy Issues in Ubiquitous Multimedia Environments: Wake Sleeping Dogs, or Let Them Lie? In: Proc. of Interact 1999, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 214–221 (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Damian, D.E., Zowghi, D.: An Insight into the Interplay between Culture, Conflict and Distance in Globally Distributed Requirements Negotiations. In: Proc. of HICSS 2003, vol. 1, p. 19c (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Battin, R., Crocker, R., Kreidler, J., Subramanian, K.: Leveraging Resources in Global Software Development. IEEE Software 18(2), 70–77 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dourish, P.: Culture and Control in a Media Space. In: Proc. of ECSCW 1993, Norwell, MA, USA, pp. 125–137. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ackerman, M.S., Starr, B., Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S.D.: Hanging on the ‘Wire: A Field Study of an Audio-only Media Space. ACM Trans. Information Systems 4(1), 39–66 (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., Dey, A.K.: Who Wants to Know What When? Privacy Preference Determinants in Ubiquitous Computing. In: Proc. of CHI 2003, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, pp. 724–725. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Consolvo, S., Smith, I.E., Matthews, T., LaMarca, A., Tabert, J., Powledge, P.: Location Disclosure to Social Relations: Why, When, & What People Want To Share. In: Proc. of CHI 2005, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 81–90. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Olson, J.S., Grudin, J., Horvitz, E.: A Study of Preferences for Sharing and Privacy. In: Proc. of CHI 2005, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 1985–1988. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Palen, L., Dourish, P.: Unpacking “Privacy” for a Networked World. In: Proc. of CHI 2003, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, pp. 129–136. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., Dey, A.K.: Towards a Deconstruction of the Privacy Space. In: Ubicomp 2003 Workshop on Ubicomp Communities: Privacy as Boundary Negotiation (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    IBM: IBM Multi-National Consumer Privacy Survey (October 1999)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Westin, A.F.: Harris-Equifax Consumer Privacy Survey 1991 (1991)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, 8th edn. Aldine Transaction, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Acquisti, A., Grossklags, J.: Privacy and Rationality. In: Strandburg, K., Raicu, D.S. (eds.) Privacy and Technologies of Identity: A Cross-Disciplinary Conversation, pp. 15–29. Sprinter, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Patil, S., Kobsa, A., John, A., Brotman, L.S., Seligmann, D.: Comparing Privacy Attitudes of Knowledge Workers in India and the U.S (forthcoming, 2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Voida, A., Newstetter, W.C., Mynatt, E.D.: When Conventions Collide: The Tensions of Instant Messaging Attributed. In: Proc. of CHI 2002, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp. 187–194. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Warren, S.D., Brandeis, L.D.: The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5), 193–220 (1890)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    González, V.M., Mark, G.: Constant, Constant, Multi-tasking Craziness”: Managing Multiple Working Spheres. In: Proc. of CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria, pp. 113–120. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Altman, I.: The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. Brooks/Cole, Monterey (1975)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hudson, J.M., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W.A., Erickson, T.: I’d be overwhelmed, but it’s just one more thing to do: Availability and Interruption in Research Management. In: Proc. of CHI 2002, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp. 97–104. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kobsa, A., Patil, S., Meyer, B.: Privacy in Instant Messaging; An Impression Management Model (forthcoming, 2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, Garden City (1959)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sameer Patil
    • 1
  • Alfred Kobsa
    • 1
  • Ajita John
    • 2
  • Lynne S. Brotman
    • 2
  • Doree Seligmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA
  2. 2.Collaborative Applications ResearchAvaya LabsBasking RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations