An Evaluation of Product Identification Techniques for Mobile Phones

  • Felix von Reischach
  • Florian Michahelles
  • Dominique Guinard
  • Robert Adelmann
  • Elgar Fleisch
  • Albrecht Schmidt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5726)

Abstract

Among others, consumer products can be purchased in the Internet and in traditional stores. Each of the two has dedicated advantages. An online survey conducted within the frames of this work investigates these advantages. It motivates the transition of the advantages of online shopping, such as access to recommendations of other consumers, to the sales floor. Recent trends in mobile phone technology, for example the emergence of the mobile Internet, enable exactly this transition, potentially enriching the shopping experience in the real world. A key challenge though is a fast and convenient identification of products. This work compares five product identification modalities for mobile phones in a comparative study. The dependent variables evaluated are ‘task completion time’ and ‘perceived ease of use’. Our study is the first that quantifies the advantage of automatic identification. The results indicate that automatically identifying a product scanning a tag can be up to eight times faster than entering a product name in a text field. Surprisingly, barcode recognition using a camera phone can be conducted almost as fast and convenient as scanning an RFID tag. Our work provides a benchmark for developers having to choose appropriate identification technology for their mobile application.

References

  1. 1.
    Szymanski, M., Hiseb, R.T.: E-Satisfaction: An Initial Examination. Journal of Retailing 76(3), 309–322 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Senecal, S., Nantel, J.: The Influence of Online Product Recommendations on Consumers’ Choices. Journal of Retailing 80(2), 159–169 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cassar, K. (2008): The Online and In-Store Crossover Conundrum. In: Nielsen Consumer Insight Magazine (2008), http://www.nielsen.com/consumer_insight/issue10/ci_story1.html (checked January 2008)
  4. 4.
    Ward, M.R., Morganowsky, M.: Consumer Acquisition of Product Information and Subsequent Purchase Channel Decisions. The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce 11, 231–255 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rohs, M., Gfeller, B.: Using Camera-Equipped Mobile Phones for Interacting with Real-World Objects. In: Ferscha, A., Hoertner, H., Kotsis, G. (eds.) Advances in Pervasive Computing, pp. 265–271. Austrian Computer Society (OCG) (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adelmann, R.: Mobile Phone Based Interaction with Everyday Products - On the Go. Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    NFC Forum NFC Data Exchange Format Technical Specification (2008), http://www.nfc-forum.org
  8. 8.
    Ondrus, J., Pigneur, Y.: An Assessment of NFC for Future Mobile Payment Systems. In: Conference on the Management of Mobile Business (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anokwa, Y., Borriello, G., Pering, T., Want, R.: A User Interaction Model for NFC Enabled Applications. Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geven, A., Strassl, P., Ferro, B., Tscheligi, M., Schwab, H.: Experiencing Real-World Interaction: Results from a NFC User Experience Field Trial. In: Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Savolainen, J., Iraji, S., Hirvola, H.: EPC UHF RFID Reader: Mobile Phone Integration and Services. In: Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thiesse, F., Michahelles, F.: An Overview of EPC Technology. Sensor Review 26(2), 101–105 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarma, S.: Towards the 5¢ Tag, Massachussets Institute of Technology, Auto-ID Center White Paper (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiechert, T., Thiesse, F., Michahelles, F., Schmitt, P., Fleisch, E.: Connecting Mobile Phones to the Internet of Things: A Discussion of Compatibility Issues between EPC and NFC. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    von Reischach, F., Guinard, D., Michahelles, F., Fleisch, E.: A Mobile Product Recommendation System Interacting with Tagged Products. In: IEEE Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, PerCom 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Hara, K., Perry, M.: Shopping Anytime Anywhere. In: CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Resatsch, F., Sandner, U., Leimeister, J.M., Krcmar, H.: Do Point of Sale RFID-based Information Services Make a Difference? Analyzing Consumer Perceptions for Designing Smart Product Information Services in Retail Business. Electronic Markets 18(3), 216–231 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zenebe, A., Ozok, A., Norcio, A.F.: Personalized Recommender Systems in E-commerce and M-commerce: A Comparative Study. In: Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International) (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Häubl, G., Trifts, V.: Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids, Marketing Science (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ballagas, R., Borchers, J., Rohs, M., Sheridan, J.: The Smart Phone: A Ubiquitous Input Device. IEEE Magazine on Pervasive Computing 5(1), 70–77 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Broll, G., Siorpaes, S., Rukzio, E., Paolucci, M., Hamard, J., Wagner, M., Schmidt, A.: Comparing Techniques for Mobile Interaction with Objects from the Real World. In: Permid Workshop at the Pervasive Conference (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rukzio, E., Broll, G., Leichtenstern, K., Schmidt, A.: Mobile Interaction with the Real World: An Evaluation and Comparison of Physical Mobile Interaction Techniques. In: Conference on Ambient Intelligence, AmI (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nelson, P.: Information and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Political Economy 78(2), 311–329 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    King, M.F., Balasubramanian, S.K.: The Effects of Expertise, End Goal, and Product Type on Adoption of Preference Formation Strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22(2), 146–159 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix von Reischach
    • 1
    • 2
  • Florian Michahelles
    • 1
  • Dominique Guinard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert Adelmann
    • 1
  • Elgar Fleisch
    • 1
    • 3
  • Albrecht Schmidt
    • 4
  1. 1.ETH ZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.SAP ResearchSwitzerland
  3. 3.University of St. GallenSwitzerland
  4. 4.University of Duisburg-EssenGermany

Personalised recommendations