Advertisement

Three Dimensional Monocular Human Motion Analysis in End-Effector Space

  • Søren Hauberg
  • Jerome Lapuyade
  • Morten Engell-Nørregård
  • Kenny Erleben
  • Kim Steenstrup Pedersen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5681)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel approach to three dimensional human motion estimation from monocular video data. We employ a particle filter to perform the motion estimation. The novelty of the method lies in the choice of state space for the particle filter. Using a non-linear inverse kinematics solver allows us to perform the filtering in end-effector space. This effectively reduces the dimensionality of the state space while still allowing for the estimation of a large set of motions. Preliminary experiments with the strategy show good results compared to a full-pose tracker.

Keywords

State Space Motion Estimation Human Motion Inverse Kinematic Visual Measurement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Poppe, R.: Vision-based human motion analysis: An overview. Computer Vision Image Understing 108(1-2), 4–18 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cappé, O., Godsill, S.J., Moulines, E.: An overview of existing methods and recent advances in sequential Monte Carlo. Proceedings of the IEEE 95(5), 899–924 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Engell-Nørregård, M., Erleben, K.: A Projected Non-linear Conjugate Gradient Method for Interactive Inverse Kinematics. In: MATHMOD 2009 - 6th Vienna International Conference on Mathematical Modelling (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moeslund, T.B., Hilton, A., Krüger, V.: A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and analysis. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 104(2), 90–126 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, J.M., Fleet, D.J., Hertzmann, A.: Gaussian Process Dynamical Models for Human Motion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30(2), 283–298 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Urtasun, R., Fleet, D.J., Fua, P.: 3D People Tracking with Gaussian Process Dynamical Models. In: CVPR 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society, Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 238–245. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu, Z., Carreira-Perpinan, M., Sminchisescu, C.: People Tracking with the Laplacian Eigenmaps Latent Variable Model. In: Platt, J., Koller, D., Singer, Y., Roweis, S. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, pp. 1705–1712. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sidenbladh, H., Black, M.J., Fleet, D.J.: Stochastic tracking of 3d human figures using 2d image motion. In: Vernon, D. (ed.) ECCV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1843, pp. 702–718. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elgammal, A.M., Lee, C.S.: Tracking People on a Torus. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31(3), 520–538 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urtasun, R., Fleet, D.J., Hertzmann, A., Fua, P.: Priors for people tracking from small training sets. In: Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2005, vol. 1, pp. 403–410 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loy, G., Eriksson, M., Sullivan, J., Carlsson, S.: Monocular 3D Reconstrunction of Human Motion in Long Action Sequences. In: Pajdla, T., Matas, J(G.) (eds.) ECCV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3024, pp. 442–455. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sminchisescu, C., Triggs, B.: Kinematic Jump Processes for Monocular 3D Human Tracking. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 69–76 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Engell-Nørregård, M., Erleben, K.: Estimation of Joint types and Joint Limits from Motion capture data. In: WSCG 2009: 17-th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical optimization. Springer Series in Operations Research. Springer, New York (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao, J., Badler, N.I.: Inverse kinematics positioning using nonlinear programming for highly articulated figures. ACM Trans. Graph. 13(4), 313–336 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baum, L.E.: An inequality and associated maximization technique in statistical estimation of probabilistic functions of markov processes. Inequalities 3, 1–8 (1972)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kalman, R.: A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transactions of the ASME-Journal of Basic Engineering 82(D), 35–45 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rubner, Y., Tomasi, C., Guibas, L.: A metric for distributions with applications to image databases. In: Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 59–66 (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sidenbladh, H., Black, M.J.: Learning image statistics for bayesian tracking. In: Proc. of International Conference on Computer Vision, Vancouver, Canada, vol. II, pp. 709–716 (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roth, S., Sigal, L., Black, M.J.: Gibbs likelihoods for bayesian tracking. In: CVPR 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knossow, D., Ronfard, R., Horaud, R.P.: Human motion tracking with a kinematic parameterization of extremal contours. International Journal of Computer Vision 79(2), 247–269 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Søren Hauberg
    • 1
  • Jerome Lapuyade
    • 1
  • Morten Engell-Nørregård
    • 1
  • Kenny Erleben
    • 1
  • Kim Steenstrup Pedersen
    • 1
  1. 1.The eScience Center, Dept. of Computer ScienceUniversity of CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations