Advertisement

Open Content, Open Learning 2.0: Using Wikis and Blogs in Higher Education

  • Steve Wheeler
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the use of open content social software (wikis and blogs) as online supporting and enabling tools for students in higher education. The chapter presents arguments from both strategic and pedagogical perspectives and focuses particularly on the reality of pedagogical change where self-directed and self-organized “informal” learning, open content, and open learning are challenging the traditionally accepted roles of both students and teachers. The chapter describes approaches used to promote best practice in the use of blogs and wikis for reflective practice, knowledge creation, and the promotion of a culture of sharing and collaboration. It introduces a new five-stage model of online learning activities presented as an adaptive framework and a second model which has been created to enable visualization of Web 2.0 tool integration. The chapter argues that open content tools present opportunities to promote positive changes in university education to enhance quality and extend access, by encouraging student-generated content, knowledge creation, and self-organized learning processes, wherever students are located.

Keywords

Collaborative Learning Short Messaging Service Open Learning Open Content Collaborative Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, N. (2006). Tim Berners-Lee on Web 2.0: nobody even knows what it means. http://www.arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060901-7650.html. Accessed 25 May 2009.
  2. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  3. Farmer, B., Yue, A., & Brooks, C. (2007). Using blogging for higher order learning in large-cohort university teaching: a case study. Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2007 Conference, Singapore, (pp. 262–270).Google Scholar
  4. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Kop, R. (2007). Blogs and wikis as disruptive technologies: Is it time for a new pedagogy? In M. Osborne, M. Houston & N. Toman (Eds.), The pedagogy of lifelong learning. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Lane, A. (2008a). Widening participation in education through open educational resources. In T. Iiyoshi & V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: the collective advancement of education through open technology, open content and open knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. McPherson, M., & Nunes, M. B. (2004). The failure of a virtual social space (VSS) designed to create a learning community: lessons learned. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Miller, H. (1995). The Presentation of Self in Electronic Life: Goffman on the Internet. Paper presented at the Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space conference. http://www.ntu.ac.uk/soc/psych/miller/goffman.htm. Goldsmiths' College, University of London. Accessed 05 June 2009
  9. Minocha, S., & Roberts, D. (2008). Pedagogical effectiveness of wikis and blogs in e-learning environments. Pragmatics and Cognition, 16(2), 272–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ojala, M. (2005). Blogging for knowledge sharing, management and dissemination. Business Information Review, 22(4), 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rogers, C. R., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Wheeler, S. (2008) Learning 2.0: How Students Are Using the Social Web in Their Learning. Paper presented at the Online Educa Berlin Conference, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  15. Wheeler, S., & Wheeler, D. (2009). Using wikis to promote quality learning outcomes in teacher training. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations