Earth Observations and Dynamic Mapping: Key Assets for Risk Management

  • Alessandro AnnoniEmail author
  • Massimo Craglia
  • Ad de Roo
  • Jesus San-Miguel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)


The timelines and the accuracy of information provided and used are recognized as being critical when dealing with emergencies. The traditional ways to display much of the information in maps had many limitations, which are now being overcome with major progress in the way data are collected, organized, accessed, and communicated. This chapter provides an overview of current Earth Observation capacity with some examples in relation to forest fires and floods that serve to illustrate the main characteristics including governance and existing limitations. The chapter also discusses how new developments in the way individuals can contribute georeferenced information may be of considerable value in addressing some of the limitations identified, particularly when time is of the essence, as is the case in emergencies.


Forest Fire Fire Fighting Fire Danger European Union Level Fire Weather Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Some theses expressed in this chapter are built on the position paper on Next Generation Digital Earth (Craglia et al. 2008) that came from the specialist meeting on Virtual Globes organized in June 2008 by the Vespucci Initiative for the Advancement of Geographic Information Science and the JRC. We are grateful to Michael F. Goodchild, Gilberto Camara, Michael Gould, Werner Kuhn, David Mark, Ian Masser, David Maguire, Steve Liang, and Ed Parsons who contributed to develop that paper and vision.


  1. Annoni A (ed.) (2005) European reference grids: Proposal for a European Grid Coding System, Volume. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, EUR 21494 EN, p. 189.Google Scholar
  2. Annoni A, Luzet C (eds.) (2000) Spatial reference systems in Europe, Volume. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, EUR 19575 EN, 73 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Annoni A, Luzet C, Gubler E, Ihde J (eds.) (2001) Map projections for Europe. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, EUR 20120 EN, 131 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Craglia M, Goodchild MF, et al. (2008) Next-generation digital earth: A position paper from the Vespucci initiative. IJSDIR 3:146–167.
  5. De Roo A, Thielen J, Maurer T (2007) Harmonised pan-European hydrological and meteorological (meta)-data to support flood studies. In: Schanze J (ed.) Flood Risk Management Research: From Extreme Events to Citizens Involvement. Leibnitz Institute of Ecological and Regional Development (IOER), Dresden, pp. 122–127.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission (1992) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2158/92 of 23 July 1992 on protection of the Community's forests against fire.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (1994) Commission Regulation (EC) No 804/94 of 11 April 1994 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2158/92 as regards forest-fire information systems.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2003) Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community (Forest Focus).Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (2007) Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (2008a) COM(2008) 46 final ‘Towards a Shared Environmental Information System (SEIS)’ (
  11. European Commission (2008b) COM(2008) 748 final ‘Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES): we care for a safer planet’ (
  12. European Parliament Resolution (2006a) (P6_TA(2006)0224).Google Scholar
  13. European Parliament Resolution (2006b) (P6_TA(2006)0349).Google Scholar
  14. Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. IJSDIR 2:24–32.
  15. Goodchild MF (2009, 2–3, March) SDI, the Citizens, and Web 2.0. Presentation at the II Trobada de la IDEC, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  16. Hiederer R, de Roo A (2003) A European Flow Network and Catchment Data Set. Report of the European Commission, JRC, EUR 20703 EN.Google Scholar
  17. San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Vogt J, de Roo A, Schmuck G (2000) Natural hazards monitoring: Forest fires, droughts, and floods – the example of European pilot projects, Surv Geophys 21:291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thielen J, Bartholmes J, Ramos M-H, de Roo A (2009) The European flood alert system – Part 1: Concept and development. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vogt JV et al. (2007) Development of a pan-European river and catchment database. In: Peckham R, Jordan G (eds.) Digital Elevation Modelling. Development and Applications in a Policy Support Environment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 121–144.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Annoni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Massimo Craglia
    • 1
  • Ad de Roo
    • 2
  • Jesus San-Miguel
    • 2
  1. 1.European Commission, DG Joint Research CentreInstitute for Environment and Sustainability, Spatial Data Infrastructures UnitIspraItaly
  2. 2.European Commission, DG Joint Research CentreInstitute for Environment and Sustainability, Land Management and Natural Hazards UnitIspraItaly

Personalised recommendations