Advertisement

Wrinkles and Acne Scars: Ablative and Nonablative Facial Resurfacing

  • Melissa A. Bogle
  • Geeta Yadav
  • Kenneth A. Arndt
  • Jeffrey S. Dover
Chapter

Abstract

Fully ablative carbon dioxide (CO2) laser resurfacing is the traditional gold standard for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rhytides and acne scars. It offers the most dramatic results but can have extensive downtime of 2 or more weeks. The Erbium:YAG laser, Erbium:YSGG laser, and plasma skin regeneration were developed to improve photoaging and textural abnormalities without the prolonged recovery time of traditional CO2 resurfacing. Clinical efficacy is generally not as impressive; however, there are less recovery time and an improved side-effect profile. The term “nonablative resurfacing” encompasses a wide range of treatments aimed at tissue remodeling and skin rejuvenation. The results vary depending on the laser or light source that is used. The goal of nonablative resurfacing is to induce selective injury of the dermis while keeping the overlying epidermis intact. Nonablative resurfacing devices include infrared lasers, visible light lasers, intense pulsed light, and light-emitting diode (LED) technology.

Keywords

Intense Pulse Light YSGG Laser Papillary Dermis Acne Scar Laser Resurface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Adrian RM. Pulsed carbon dioxide and long pulse 10–ms erbium-YAG laser resurfacing: a comparative clinical and histological study. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1:197–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alster TS. Cutaneous resurfacing with CO2 and erbium:YAG lasers: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:619–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alster TS, Garg S. Treatment of facial rhytides with a high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;98:791–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alster TS, Lupton JR. Erbium:YAG cutaneous laser resurfacing. Dermatol Clin. 2001;19:453–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alster TS, West TB. Resurfacing of atrophic facial acne scars with a high-energy, pulsed carbon dioxide laser. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22:151–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Apfelberg DB. A critical appraisal of high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser facial resurfacing for acne scars. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38:95–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Avram MK, Goldman MP. The safety and effectiveness of single-pass erbium:YAG laser in the treatment of mild to moderate photodamage. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:1073–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bailin PL, Ratz JL, Levine HL. Removal of tattoos by CO2 laser. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1980;6:977–1001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernstein LJ, Kauvar AN, Grossman MC, Geronemus RG. The short- and long-term side effects of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:519–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernstein LJ, Kauvar ANB, Geronemus RG. Scar resurfacing with high energy, short-pulsed and flashscanning carbon dioxide lasers. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24:101–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bitter PH. Non-invasive rejuvenation of photodamaged skin using serial, full face intense pulsed light treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:835–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bitter Jr P, Mulholland RS. Report of a new technique for enhanced non-invasive skin rejuvenation using a dual mode pulsed light and radiofrequency energy source: selective radiothermolysis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2002;1:142–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bogle MA, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Evaluation of plasma skin regeneration technology in low fluence full-facial rejuvenation. Arch Dermatol. 2007;6:1110–2.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bogle MA, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Mordon S. Evaluation of the 1540-nm erbium-glass laser in the treatment of inflammatory facial acne. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:810–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    David LM, Lask GP, Glassberg E, Jacoby R, Abergel RP. Laser abrasion for cosmetic and medical treatment of facial actinic damage. Cutis. 1989;43:583–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dayan SH, Vartanian AJ, Menaker G, Mobley SR, Dayan AN. Nonablative laser resurfacing using the long-pulse (1064-nm) Nd:YAG laser. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5:310–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldberg DJ, Silapunt S. Q-switched Nd:YAG laser: rhytid improvement by non-ablative dermal remodeling. J Cutan Laser Ther. 2000;2:157–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldberg DJ, Silapunt S. Histologic evaluation of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in the nonablative treatment of wrinkles. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:744–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeHoratius D, Dover JS. Nonablative tissue remodeling and photorejuvenation. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:474–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dover JS, Bhatia AC, Stewart B, Arndt KA. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid combined with intense pulsed light in the treatment of photoaging. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:1247–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fitzpatrick RE, Rostan EF, Marchell N. Collagen tightening by carbon dioxide versus erbium:YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;27:395–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fournier N, Dahan S, Diridollou S, et al. Nonablative remodeling: clinical, histological, ultrasound imaging, and profilometric evaluation of a 1540 nm Er:glass laser. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:799–806.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldberg DJ. Full face non-ablative dermal remodeling with 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:915–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldberg D, Tan M, Dale Sarradet M, Gordon M. Nonablative dermal remodeling with a 585-nm, 350-microsec, flashlamp pulsed dye laser: clinical and ultrastructural analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:161–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Horton S, Alster TS. Preoperative and postoperative considerations for carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Cutis. 1999;64:399–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kauvar AB, Waldorf HA, Geronemus RG. A histopathological comparison of “char-free” carbon dioxide lasers. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22:343–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khatri KA, Machado A, Magro C, Davenport S. Laser peel: Facial rejuvenation with a superficial erbium:YAG laser treatment. J Cutan Laser Ther. 2000;2:119–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kilmer S, Semchyshyn N, Shah G, Fitzpatrick R. A pilot study on the use of a plasma skin regeneration device (Portrait PSR3) in full facial rejuvenation procedures. Lasers Med Sci. 2007;22:101–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kye YC. Resurfacing of pitted facial scars with a pulsed Er:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:880–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee DH, Choi YS, Min SU, Yoon MI, Suh DH. Comparison of a 585-nm pulsed dye laser and a 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of acne scars: a randomized split-face clinical study. Dermatol Surg. 2009; 60:801-7.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Madden MR, Nolan E, Finkelstein JL, et al. Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressing and the effect of the wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation. J Trauma. 1989;29:924–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marcells GN, Ellis DA. Laser facial skin resurfacing: discussion on erbium:YAG and CO2 lasers. J Otolaryngol. 2000;29:78–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McBurney EL. Carbon dioxide laser surgery of dermatologic lesions. South Med J. 1978;71:795–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McDaniel DH, Lord J, Ash K, Newman J. Combined CO2/Erbium:YAG laser resurfacing of peri-oral rhytides and side-by-side comparison with carbon dioxide laser alone. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:285–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Patel CKN, McFarlane RA, Faust WL. Selective excitation through vibrational energy transfer and optical maser action in N2-CO2. Physiol Rev. 1964;13:617–9.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ratner D, Yardy T, Marchell N, Goldman MP, Fitzpatrick RE, Fader DJ. Cutaneous laser resurfacing. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:365–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Roberts TL, Weinstein C, Alexandides JK, Yokoo KM. Aesthetic CO2 laser surgery: evaluation of 907 patients. Aesth Surg J. 1997;17:293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ross EV, Domankevitz Y, Skribal M, Anderson RR. Effects of CO2 laser pulse duration in ablation and residual thermal damage. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;19:123–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ross EV, Sajben FP, Hsia J, et al. Non ablative skin remodeling: selective dermal heating with mid-infrared laser and contact cooling combination. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26:186–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ross EV, Swann M, Soon S, Izadpanah A, Barnette D, Davenport S. Full-face treatments with the 2790-nm erbium:YSGG laser system. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009;8:248–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tan MH, Dover JS, Hsu TS, Arndt KA, Stewart B. Clinical evaluation of enhanced nonablative skin rejuvenation using a combination of a 532 and a 1,064 nm laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34:439–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Comparison of a 1450–nm diode laser and a 1320-nm Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of atrophic facial scars: A prospective clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:152–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Teikemeier G, Goldberg DJ. Skin resurfacing with the erbium:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:685–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Trelles MA, Rigau J, Velez M. LLLT and in vivo effects on mast cells. In: Simunovic Z, editor. Lasers in medicine and dentistry. Croatia: Vitagraf; 2000.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Walia S, Alster TS. Prolonged clinical and histologic effects from CO2 laser resurfacing of atrophic acne scars. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:926–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weiss RA, McDaniel DH, Geronemus RG. Review of nonablative photorejuvenation: Reversal of the aging effects of the sun and environmental damage using laser and light sources. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003;22:93–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Weiss RA, McDaniel DH, Geronemus RG, Weiss MA. Clinical trial of a novel non-thermal LED array for reversal of photoaging: Clinical, histologic, and surface profilometric results. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;36:85–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zelickson B, Kist D. Effect of pulse dye laser and intense pulsed light source on the dermal extracellular matrix remodeling. Lasers Surg Med Suppl. 2000;12:17.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zelickson BD, Kilmer SL, Bernstein E, et al. Pulsed dye laser therapy for sun damaged skin. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;25:229–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa A. Bogle
    • 1
    • 2
  • Geeta Yadav
    • 3
  • Kenneth A. Arndt
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  • Jeffrey S. Dover
    • 4
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.The Laser and Cosmetic Surgery Center of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Northern Ontario School of MedicineGreater SudburyCanada
  4. 4.SkinCare PhysiciansChestnut HillUSA
  5. 5.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  6. 6.Yale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  7. 7.Dartmouth Medical SchoolHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations