Framework for Value Prediction of Knowledge-Based Applications

  • Ali Imtiaz
  • Tobias Bürger
  • Igor O. Popov
  • Elena Simperl
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 37)

Abstract

Knowledge-based applications are characterized by their use of machine-understandable formalizations of expert knowledge. Complex knowledge structures, and the features which exploit them, can have a significant effect on the effort needed to develop such applications. Means to estimate this effort are, however, lacking. Furthermore, precise benefits of such applications, which are directly attributed to specific functionalities, remain unknown.

In this paper we propose a preliminary Framework for Value Prediction whose intention is to study and to effectively predict the development effort as well as benefits of knowledge-based applications. The framework consists of five pillars which act as a road map to propose well-defined models. We furthermore discuss our initial experiences with using the framework to adapt existing software cost and benefit estimation models.

Keywords

Framework for Value Prediction cost estimation benefit estimation knowledge-based technologies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Imtiaz, A., Giernalczyk, A., Davies, J., Kings, N.J., Thurlow, I.: Cost, Benefit Engineering for Collaborative Knowledge Creation within Knowledge Workspaces. In: Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boehm, B.W., Abts, C., Clark, B., Devnani-Chulani, S.: Cocomo II model definition manual (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bürger, T., Simperl, E.: Measuring the Benefits of Ontologies. In: Proc. of Ontology Content and Evaluation in Enterprise, (OntoContent 2008) (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quadt, A., Laing, P., Forzi, T., Bleck, S.: Development of approaches and mobile business solutions for field service. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rhensius, T., Dünnebacke, D.: An integrated approach for the planning and evaluation of Auto-ID applications. In: Proc. of the European Workshop on RFID Systems and Technologies, pp. 1–6 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wigg, K.M.: Knowledge management: an introduction and perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management 1(1), 6–14 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teas, R.K., Agarwal, S.: The Effects of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(2), 278–290 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knight, S., Burn, J.: Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on the World Wide Web. Informing Science Journal 8 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Denne, M.J.: Demonstrating IT Payoff  01 (2007), http://www.cio.com
  10. 10.
    Denne, M.J.: Chargeback Demonstrates IT Value in the enterprise 01 (2007), http://www.cio.com
  11. 11.
    Cherubin, S., Terribile, K.: Business Analysts: A Key to Companies’ Success 08 (2008), http://www.cio.com

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Imtiaz
    • 1
  • Tobias Bürger
    • 2
  • Igor O. Popov
    • 2
  • Elena Simperl
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute for Operations Management (FIR) at Aachen University of TechnologyGermany
  2. 2.Semantic Technology Institute (STI) InnsbruckUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations