A Practical Exploration of Ontology Interoperability

  • Simon Polovina
  • James Cooke
  • Jeremy Loke
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5662)


ISO Common Logic (CL, ISO/IEC 24707:2007) offers the Semantic Web (SW) a new and powerful dimension in achieving the effective discovery, automation, integration, and reuse across applications, data and knowledge. The paper shows how it is possible to explore such interoperability through small scale exemplar projects. As Conceptual Graphs (CG) is a key technology in CL, we focused on the Amine CG software and for the SW we focused on the Protégé OWL software, exploring the possible mappings between ontologies captured in OWL and in Amine. Through this practical exercise the dimensions and extent of the desired interoperability could be demonstrated. This small but significant experiment provided a practical insight into how CG Tools can actually interoperate towards achieving the wider goal of Ontology interoperability between CL and the SW.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abdulrub, S., Polovina, S., Sandberg-Petersen, U., et al.: Implementing interoperability through an ontology importer for Amine. In: Croitoru, M., Jäschke, R., Rudolph, S. (eds.) CS-TIW 2008 Proceedings, CEUR-WS, Germany, vol. 352, pp. 1–6 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coupey, P., Faron, C.: Towards correspondences between Conceptual Graphs and Description Logics. In: Mugnier, M.-L., Chein, M. (eds.) ICCS 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1453, pp. 165–178. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corby, O.: Web, Graphs and Semantics. In: Eklund, P., Haemmerlé, O. (eds.) ICCS 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5113, pp. 43–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delugach, H.S.: Towards Conceptual Structures Interoperability Using Common Logic. In: Croitoru, M., Jäschke, R., Rudolph, S. (eds.) CS-TIW 2008 Proceedings, Germany. CEUR-WS, vol. 352, pp. 13–21 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meijer, E., Beckman, B., Bierman, G.: LINQ: Reconciling Object, Relations and XML in the.NET Framework. In: SIGMOD 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p. 706. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polovina, S.: An introduction to conceptual graphs. In: Priss, U., Polovina, S., Hill, R. (eds.) ICCS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4604, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodrigues, T., Rosa, P., Cardoso, J.: Moving from Syntactic to Semantic Organizations using JXML2OWL. Computers in Industry 59(8), 808–819 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rudolph, S., Krötzsch, M., Hitzler, P.: Quo Vadis, CS? - On the (non)-Impact of Conceptual Structures on the Semantic Web. In: Priss, U., Polovina, S., Hill, R. (eds.) ICCS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4604, pp. 464–467. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1984)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tolk, A., Muguira, J.: The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model (LCIM). In: Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Washington DC (April 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tolk, A., Turnitsa, C., Diallo, S.: Implied Ontological Representation within the Levels of Conceptual Interoperability. Intelligent Decision Technologies 2, 3–19 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Polovina
    • 1
  • James Cooke
    • 1
  • Jeremy Loke
    • 1
  1. 1.Cultural, Communication & Computing Research Centre (CCRC)Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations