Advertisement

Evaluation Metrics for eHealth Services and Applications within Smart Houses Context

  • Dimosthenis Georgiadis
  • Panagiotis Germanakos
  • Panayiotis Andreou
  • George Samaras
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5597)

Abstract

eHealth services is a continuously growing sector, driving the need for advances in both the network characteristics and infrastructure, as well as in the available mobile devices used. The same need requires the development of quality software applications to facilitate and service eHealth activities. On these grounds, this paper proposes a novel evaluation methodology that takes into consideration the peculiarities of sensor/actuator related services. It further focuses on aspects of software quality for eHealth services and applications, and identifies a set of quality characteristics and attributes to take into consideration. These quality characteristics are integrated into our proposed evaluation methodology during the analysis and engineering phases, which is a revised version of the spiral software process used in web engineering. The efficacy of the proposed approach in a real scenario is discussed.

Keywords

Quality Characteristic Evaluation Metrics Quality Metrics Quality Software Service Orient Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andreou, A.S., Panayidou, D., Andreou, P., Pitsillides, A.: Preserving Quality in the Development of Mobile Commerce Services and Applications. In: ACIT Software Engineering, Novosibirsk, Russia, June 20-24, pp. 11–16. IASTED/ACTA Press (2005) ISBN 0-88986-504-3Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Gomez, J.A.: Middleware evaluation framework. Technical Report, 6th Framework Programme Project: MPOWER - Middleware Platform for eMPOWERing cognitive disabled and elderly (Contract no. 034707) (November 2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panayiotis, A.: Middleware Validation Report. Technical Report, 6th Framework Programme Project: MPOWER - Middleware Platform for eMPOWERing cognitive disabled and elderly (Contract no. 034707) (January 2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architect: Concept, Technology, & Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oracle Service Oriented Architecture, http://www.oracle.com/technologies/soa/index.html
  7. 7.
    IBM Service Oriented Architecture, http://www-01.ibm.com/software/solutions/soa/
  8. 8.
    Microsoft Service Oriented Architecture, http://www.microsoft.com/SOA/
  9. 9.
    Netcarity Project. Official Website, http://www.netcarity.org
  10. 10.
    Soprano Project. Official Website, http://www.soprano-ip.org
  11. 11.
    Companionable Project. Official Website, http://www.companionable.net
  12. 12.
    Friedman, C.P., Wyatt, J., Ash, J.: Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics: An Evidence-based Approach, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimosthenis Georgiadis
    • 1
  • Panagiotis Germanakos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Panayiotis Andreou
    • 1
  • George Samaras
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus
  2. 2.Department of Management and MISUniversity of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations