Implications of User Anxiety in the Evaluation of Deception in Web Sites

  • Brent Auernheimer
  • Marie Iding
  • Martha E. Crosby
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5638)

Abstract

In a pilot study, we investigated the effect of anxiety on users’ susceptibility to deceptive information on Web pages. Specifically, we manipulated the perceived control and associated anxiety of participants with and without visual disabilities as they used an assistive technology, a screen reader. Preliminary findings indicated that anxious participants (i.e., without visual disabilities) using the unfamiliar assistive technology were more susceptible to deception and expressed more suspicion regarding the Web pages. We interpret these preliminary findings as consistent with the work of Whitson and Galinsky [1] and discuss implications for further research in Web site credibility determinations and users’ susceptibility to deception.

Keywords

Deception Web Sites Anxiety Control Assistive Technology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Whitson, J.A., Galinsky, A.D.: Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern Perception. Science 322, 115–117 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iding, M., Auernheimer, B., Crosby, M.E., Klemm, E.B.: Web Site Credibility: Why do People Believe What They Believe? Instr. Sci. 37, 43–63 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fogg, B.J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E.R.: How Do People Evaluate a Web Site’s Credibility: Results from a large study (2002), http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/dynamic/web-credibility-reports-evaluate-abstract.cfm
  4. 4.
    Benotsch, E.G., Kalichman, S., Weinhardt, L.S.: HIV-AIDS Patients’ Evaluation of Helath Information on the Internet: The Digital Divide and Vulnerability to fraudulent claims. J. of Consulting and Clin. Psych. 72, 1004–1011 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iding, M., Auernheimer, B., Crosby, M.: Towards a Metacognitive Approach to Credibility. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web in Conjunction with ACM 17th Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CD ROM - Workshop Proceedings, pp. 76–80 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iding, M., Nordbotten, J., Singh, J.M.: Credibility: Norwegian Students Evaluate Media Studies Web Sites. In: Kuma, D., Turner, J. (eds.) Education for the 21st century: Impact of ICT and digital resources: WCC 2006, Santiago, Chile, pp. 327–331. Springer, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rudski, J.M.: Malinowski Goes to College: Factors Influencing Students’ Use of Ritual and Superstition. J. of Gen. Psych. 134, 389–403 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson-Inman, L., Horney, M.A.: Assistive Technology Through Text Transformations. Reading Res. Quarterly 42, 153–160 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Badge, J.L., Dawson, E., Cann, A.J., Scott, J.: Assessing the Accessibility of Online Learning. Innovations in Ed. And Teaching International 45, 103–113 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rotter, J.B.: Generalized Expectancies for Internal, External Control of Reinforcement. Psychological Monographs 80, 1–28 (1966)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shneiderman, B.: Universal usability. Communications of the ACM 43(5), 84–91 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brent Auernheimer
    • 1
  • Marie Iding
    • 2
  • Martha E. Crosby
    • 3
  1. 1.Digital CampusCalifornia State UniversityFresnoU.S.A.
  2. 2.College of EducationUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of Information and Computer SciencesUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations