SAT 2009: Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing - SAT 2009 pp 51-64 | Cite as
The Complexity of Reasoning for Fragments of Default Logic
Abstract
Default logic was introduced by Reiter in 1980. In 1992, Gottlob classified the complexity of the extension existence problem for propositional default logic as \(\Sigma^{\rm P}_2\)-complete, and the complexity of the credulous and skeptical reasoning problem as \(\Sigma^{\rm P}_2\)-complete, resp. \(\Pi^{\rm P}_2\)-complete. Additionally, he investigated restrictions on the default rules, i. e., semi-normal default rules. Selman made in 1992 a similar approach with disjunction-free and unary default rules. In this paper we systematically restrict the set of allowed propositional connectives. We give a complete complexity classification for all sets of Boolean functions in the meaning of Post’s lattice for all three common decision problems for propositional default logic. We show that the complexity is a trichotomy (\(\Sigma^{\rm P}_2\)-, NP-complete, trivial) for the extension existence problem, whereas for the credulous and sceptical reasoning problem we get a finer classification down to NL-complete cases.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [BCRV03]Böhler, E., Creignou, N., Reith, S., Vollmer, H.: Playing with Boolean blocks, part I: Post’s lattice with applications to complexity theory. SIGACT News 34(4), 38–52 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [BEZ02]Ben-Eliyahu-Zohary, R.: Yet some more complexity results for default logic. Artificial Intelligence 139(1), 1–20 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [BMTV08]Beyersdorff, O., Meier, A., Thomas, M., Vollmer, H.: The complexity of propositional implication. ACM Computing Research Repository, arXiv:0811.0959v1 [cs.CC] (2008)Google Scholar
- [BO02]Bonatti, P.A., Olivetti, N.: Sequent calculi for propositional nonmonotonic logics. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 3(2), 226–278 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [CHS07]Chapdelaine, P., Hermann, M., Schnoor, I.: Complexity of default logic on generalized conjunctive queries. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4483, pp. 58–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [Got92]Gottlob, G.: Complexity results for nonmonotonic logics. Journal of Logic Computation 2(3), 397–425 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Got95]Gottlob, G.: Translating default logic into standard autoepistemic logic. J. ACM 42(4), 711–740 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Kon88]Konolige, K.: On the relation between default and autoepistemic logic. Artificial Intelligence 35(3), 343–382 (1988); Erratum: Artificial Intelligence 41(1), 115MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [KS91]Kautz, H.A., Selman, B.: Hard problems for simple default logics. Artificial Intelligence 49, 243–279 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Lew79]Lewis, H.: Satisfiability problems for propositional calculi. Mathematical Systems Theory 13, 45–53 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [McC80]McCarthy, J.: Circumscription – a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13, 27–39 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [MT93]Marek, V.W., Truszczyński, M.: Nonmonotonic Logic. Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Pap94]Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
- [Pos41]Post, E.: The two-valued iterative systems of mathematical logic. Annals of Mathematical Studies 5, 1–122 (1941)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [Rei80]Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13, 81–132 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Sel82]Selman, A.L.: Reductions on NP and p-selective sets. Theoretical Computer Science 19, 287–304 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [SI90]Sridhar, R., Iyengar, S.: Efficient parallel algorithms for functional dependency manipulations. In: Proc. 2nd DPDS, pp. 126–137 (1990)Google Scholar
- [Sti90]Stillman, J.: It’s not my default: The complexity of membership problems in restricted propositional default logics. In: Proc. 8th AAAI, pp. 571–578 (1990)Google Scholar
- [Vol99]Vollmer, H.: Introduction to Circuit Complexity. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar