Analysis of Information Disclosure on a Social Networking Site

  • Katherine Peterson
  • Katie A. Siek
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5621)

Abstract

We present a small study about information disclosure and awareness of disclosure implications on Couchsurfing.com. Couchsurfing is an online social networking site where users connect with others interested in traveling and staying at each other’s homes. Since users are looking for someone to stay or travel with, they must develop a rapport and trust before traveling. This leads users to share more information on their Couchsurfing profile than they ordinarily would share on mainstream social networking sites such as Facebook or MySpace. After a survey with twenty Couchsurfing users and semi-structured interviews with nine participants, we found participants were generally not concerned with the information they disclosed online and were not aware of how this information could be used against them by malicious third parties. We conclude the paper with a brief discussion of how designers and developers could utilize personas to better inform participants of the implications of their disclosure decisions.

Keywords

Social Networking Information Disclosure Privacy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alessandro, A.: Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification, pp. 21–29. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd, D.: Reflections on Friendster, Trust and Intimacy, Seattle, WA (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd, D.M.: Friendster and publicly articulated social networking, pp. 1279–1282. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collins, L.: Friend Game: Behind the online hoax that led to a girl’s suicide, The New Yorker (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Consolvo, S., et al.: Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share, pp. 81–90. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donath, J., Boyd, D.: Public Displays of Connection. BT Technology Journal 22, 71–82 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gross, R., Acquisti, A., Heinz, J.H.: Information revelation and privacy in online social networks, pp. 71–80. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kay, H.C., et al.: The Internet Hunt Revisited: Personal Information Accessible via the Web (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumaraguru, P., Cranor, L.F.: Privacy Indexes: A Survey of Westin’s Studies, Carnegie Mellon University of Computer Science (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackay, W.E.: Triggers and barriers to customizing software, pp. 153–160. ACM, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Musil, S.: Google wins Street View privacy suit. CNET News, Digital Media. CNET (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Philippe, G.: Revisiting the uniqueness of simple demographics in the US population, pp. 77–80. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Preece, J.: Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success. In: Behaviour and Information Technology, pp. 347–356. Taylor and Francis Ltd., Abington (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sweeney, L.: Uniqueness of Simple Demographics in the U.S. Population, Carnegie Mellon University, Laboratory for International Data Privacy (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine Peterson
    • 1
  • Katie A. Siek
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Mathematics, 526 UCBUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science, 430 UCBUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations