Advertisement

Metacommunication Patterns in Online Communities

  • Arto Lanamäki
  • Tero Päivärinta
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5621)

Abstract

This paper discusses about contemporary literature on computer-mediated metacommunication and observes the phenomenon in two online communities. The results contribute by identifying six general-level patterns of how metacommunication refers to primary communication in online communities. A task-oriented, user-administrated, community (Wikipedia in Finnish) involved a remarkable number of specialized metacommunication genres. In a centrally moderated discussion-oriented community (Patientslikeme), metacommunication was intertwined more with primary ad hoc communication. We suggest that a focus on specialized metacommunication genres may appear useful in online communities. However, room for ad hoc (meta)communication is needed as well, as it provides a basis for user-initiated community development.

Keywords

Online community metacommunication genre computer-mediated communication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baym, N.K.: The Emergence of Community in Computer-Mediated Communication. In: Jones, S.G. (ed.) Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, pp. 138–163. Sage, London (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Souza, C.S., Preece, J.: A Framework for Analyzing and Understanding Online Communities. Interacting with Computers 16(3), 579–610 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stanoevska-Slabeva, K.: Toward a Community-Oriented Design of Internet Platforms. Int. J. Electron Commerce 6(3), 71–95 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yetim, F.: Acting with Genres: Discursive-Ethical Concepts for Reflecting on and Legitimating Genres. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 15(1), 54–69 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanskanen, S.-K.: Metapragmatic Utterances in Computer-Mediated Interaction. In: Bublitz, W., Hübler, A. (eds.) Metapragmatics in Use, pp. 87–106. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ludford, P.J., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L.: Think Different: Increasing Online Community Participation Using Uniqueness and Group Dissimilarity. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 631–638. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Vito, J.: The Interpersonal Communication Book, 9th edn. Addison-Wesley, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bateson, G.: Information and Codification: A Philosophical Approach. In: Ruesch, J., Bateson, G. (eds.) Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry, pp. 168–211. W.W. Norton, New York (1951)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bateson, G.: Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1972)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilmot, W.W.: Metacommunication: A Re-examination and Extension. In: Nimmo, D. (ed.) Communication Yearbook, vol. 4, pp. 61–69. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1980)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takeuchi, K., Takagi, H., Nagata, M.: Computer-Supported Meta-Communication Analysis of Meetings. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commerce 7(1), 1–15 (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wesemann, D., Grunwald, M.: Online Discussion Groups for Bulimia Nervosa: An Inductive Approach to Internet-Based Communication between Patients. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 41(6), 527–534 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Päivärinta, T.: The Concept of Genre within the Critical Approach to Information Systems Development. Inform. Organ 11(3), 207–234 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ulrich, W.: A Philosophical Staircase for Information Systems Definition, Design, and Development. J. Inform. Tech. Theor. Appl. 3(3), 55–84 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yates, J., Orlikowski, W.J.: Genres of Organisational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media. Acad. Manag. Rev. 17(2), 299–326 (1992)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bergquist, M., Ljungberg, J.: Genres in Action: Negotiating Genres in Practice. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences [CD-ROM], vol. 2. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoppenbrouwers, S., Weigand, H.: Meta-communication in the Language Action Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP 2000), pp. 131–149. RWTH Aachen, Aachen (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yates, J., Orlikowski, W.J., Okamura, K.: Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction. Organ Sci. 10(1), 83–103 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arto Lanamäki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tero Päivärinta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of AgderKristiansandNorway
  2. 2.University of BergenNorway

Personalised recommendations