Advertisement

A Visualization Approach for Group Behaviors, Beliefs and Intentions to Support Critical Decisions

  • Colleen L. Phillips
  • Norman D. Geddes
  • Justin T. Simms
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5621)

Abstract

During persistent surveillance of a given population in a conflict situation, data management can quickly become unwieldy due to the inundation of low-level information from many, disparate sources. Computational population models can easily fuse and aggregate information input, but there is still the challenge of providing effective data visualization which minimizes information overload and introduces misinterpretation by simplified visualization based on aggregations. Visualizations of the actionable knowledge to the analyst based on the population effects as evidenced by their stratagemical behaviors are needed. Five model classes that study the beliefs of groups and how their beliefs change as a result of events were evaluated for their potential for visualization based on an analyst’s cognitive model of the conflict situation.A visualization approach was developed that can be used for all of the classes of models based on frames of reference for time and physical location within the environment.

Keywords

data visualization group modeling stratagemical behaviors beliefs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Myers, R.B.: National Military Strategic Plan for the War on Terrorism. In: NMSP-WOT. Strategic Studies Institute, Washington (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kem, J.D.: Understanding the Operation Environment: The Expansion of DIME. University of Military Intelligence (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lennox, R.: Modeling and Simulation in an Era of Persistent Conflict. Headquarters, Department of the Army G-3/5 Strategic Plans, Concepts, & Doctrine Division (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phillips, C.L., Geddes, N., Crosscope, J.: Bayesian Modeling using Belief Nets of Perceived Threat Levels Affected by Stratagemical Behavior Patterns. In: 2nd International Conference on Cultural Computational Dynamics. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luck, G., Findlay, M.: Joint Operations: Insights and Best Practices. Joint Warfighting Center’s Joint Training Division, US Joint Forces Command (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Turchin, F.: Historical Dynamics: Why State Rise and Fall. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carrington, P., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (eds.): Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sage, A., Rouse, W. (eds.): Handbook of Systems Engineering. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carbonell, J.: POLITICS: Automated Ideological Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Philadelphia (1978)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hogg, M., Tindale, S.: The Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wickens, C., Hollands, J.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Phillips, C., Sokoloff, S., Crosscope, J., Geddes, N.: A Validation Process for Predicting Stratagemical Behavior Patterns of Powerful Leaders in Conflict. In: 2nd International Workshop on Social Computing, Behavioral Modeling and Prediction. Springer, New York (2009) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuckman, B.: Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psy. Bul. 63(6), 384 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phillips, C.L., Geddes, N., Kanareykin, S.: A Balanced Approach for LLOs Using Group Dynamics for COIN Efficacy. In: 2nd International Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference, HFES, Santa Monica (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colleen L. Phillips
    • 1
  • Norman D. Geddes
    • 1
  • Justin T. Simms
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Systems Intelligence, Inc.AlpharettaUSA

Personalised recommendations