Advertisement

Emergent Design: Serendipity in Digital Educational Games

  • Michael D. Kickmeier-Rust
  • Dietrich Albert
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5622)

Abstract

Using computer games for educational purposes is a fascinating idea that is getting increasingly popular amongst educators, researchers, and developers. From a technical as well as psycho-pedagogical viewpoint, today’s educational games are at an early stage. Most products cannot compete with non-educational, commercial games and not with conventional educational software. Research must address fundamental challenges such as methods for convincing learning-game design or individualization of gaming experiences. An important key factor is development costs. To enter the market successfully requires reducing development costs significantly, however, without reducing gaming or learning quality. In this paper we introduce an approach of using existing methods for educational adaptation and personalization together with ideas of emergent game design.

Keywords

Digital educational games game-based learning adaptation  personalization interactive storytelling emergent game design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Campbell, J.: Hero with a thousand faces. Harper Collins Religious, Pymble, Australia (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Bra, P.: Adaptive hypermedia. In: Adelsberger, H.H., Kinshuk, Pawlowski, J.M., Sampson, D. (eds.) Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training, pp. 29–46. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forsyth, T.: Cellular Automata for Physical Modelling. In: Treglia, D. (ed.) Game Programming Gems 3, pp. 200–214. Charles River Media, Inc., Hingham (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnnson, S.: Emergence: the Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities and Software. Scribner, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Albert, D.: The ELEKTRA ontology model: A learner-centered approach to resource description. In: Leung, H., Li, F., Lau, R., Li, Q. (eds.) ICWL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4823, pp. 78–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Albert, D., Hockemeyer, C., Augustin, T.: Not breaking the narrative: Individualized Competence Assessment in Educational Games. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Games based Learning (ECGBL), Paisley, Scotland, October 25-26 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Göbel, S., Albert, D.: 80Days: Melding adaptive educational technology and adaptive and interactive storytelling in digital educational games. In: Klamma, R., Sharda, N., Fernández-Manjòn, B., Kosch, H., Spaniol, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Story-Telling and Educational Games (STEG 2008) - The power of narration and imagination in technology enhanced learning, Maastricht, The Netherlands, September 18-19 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Hockemeyer, C., Albert, D., Augustin, T.: Micro adaptive, non-invasive assessment in educational games. In: Eisenberg, M., Kinshuk, Chang, M., McGreal, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the second IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, Banff, Canada, November 17-19, 2008, pp. 135–137 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leonard, T.: Building an AI Sensory System: Examining the Design of Thief: The Dark Project, Gamasutra, March 7 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lindley, C.A.: Game Taxonomies: A High Level Framework for Game Analysis and Design. Gamasutra, October 3 (2003), http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20031003/lindley_01.shtml (retrieved October 23, 2008)
  11. 11.
    Peinado, F., Gómez-Martín, P.P., Gómez-Martín, M.M.: A game architecture for emergent story-puzzles in a persistent world. In: International DiGRA Conference, Vancouver, Canada, June 16-20 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pressey, S.L.: A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores and teaches. School and Society 23(586), 373–376 (1926)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Russel, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smed, J., Hakonen, H.: Towards a Definition of a Computer Game. Technical Report, Nr. 553, Turku Centre for Computer Science, Turku, Finland (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, H.: Systemic Level Design. In: The Game Developers Conference, San Jose, CA, March 21-23 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sweetser, P.: Environmental Awareness in Game Agents. In: Rabin, S. (ed.) AI Game Programming Wisdom, vol. 3, Charles River Media, Inc., Hingham, MA (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sweetser, P.: An Emergent Approach to Game Design - Development and Play. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Queensland, Australia (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sweetser, P., Johnson, D., Sweetser, J., Wiles, J.: Creating Engaging Artificial Characters for Games. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing, pp. 1–8. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Kickmeier-Rust
    • 1
  • Dietrich Albert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations