Varying the Office Work Posture between Standing, Half-Standing and Sitting Results in Less Discomfort

  • Peter Vink
  • Ineke Konijn
  • Ben Jongejan
  • Monique Berger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5624)

Abstract

In this study 10 subjects worked two weeks in their rather new normal work station and two weeks in another work station. These VDU workers were trained and received a table making standing work possible. They also received a chair making half sitting possible. The effects on experienced variation in posture and discomfort were studied. It appeared that most of the time people work in the normal sitting situation (69% in the new and 90% in the old work station). Sometimes the half sitting and standing posture was used in the new situation. This new situation had a significant lower discomfort in the back, neck and shoulder region compared with the old situation.

Keywords

variation in posture VDU work sitting discomfort standing work 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stranden, E.: Dynamic leg volume changes when sitting in a locked and free floating tilt office chair. Ergonomics 43(3), 421–433 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vellinga, R.: Researching sit-stand tables (in Dutch). Witteveen Project-Inrichtingen, Ouderkerk aan de Amstel (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miedema, M.: The effect of standing tables in an insurance company (in Dutch). TNO, Hoofddorp (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aaras, A.E.S., Fostervold, K.I., Ro, O., Thoresen, M., Larsen, S.: Postural load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures. Ergonomics 40(11), 1255–1268 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vink, P.: Comfort and Design: Principles and Good Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nordin, M.: Zusammenhang zwischen Sitzen und arbeitsbedingten Rückenschmerzen. In: Wilke, H.J. (ed.) Ergomechanics, pp. 10–35. Shaker Verlag, Aachen (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Dieën, J.H., de Looze, M.P., Hermans, V.: Effects of dynamic office chairs on trunk kinematics, trunk extensor EMG and spinal shrinkage. Ergonomics 44, 739–750 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robertson, M., Amick, B.C., DeRango, K., Rooney, T., Bazzanid, L., Harrist, R., Moore, H.: The effects of an office ergonomics training and chair intervention on worker knowledge, behavior and musculoskeletal risk. Applied Ergonomics 40, 124–135 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Grinten, M.P., Smitt, P.: Development of a practical method for measuring body part discomfort. Industrial Ergonomics and Safety IV, 311–318 (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamberg-van Reenen, H.: Physical capacity and work related musculoskeletal symptoms. PhD thesis Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Vink
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ineke Konijn
    • 3
  • Ben Jongejan
    • 4
  • Monique Berger
    • 4
  1. 1.TNO Work and EmploymentAS Hoofddorpthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Industrial Design EngineeringDelft University of Technologythe Netherlands
  3. 3.Ergoshopthe Netherlands
  4. 4.Human Kinetic TechnologyThe Hague Universitythe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations