Is It Possible to Predict the Manual Web Accessibility Result Using the Automatic Result?

  • Carlos Casado Martínez
  • Loïc Martínez-Normand
  • Morten Goodwin Olsen
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_68

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5616)
Cite this paper as:
Casado Martínez C., Martínez-Normand L., Olsen M.G. (2009) Is It Possible to Predict the Manual Web Accessibility Result Using the Automatic Result?. In: Stephanidis C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services. UAHCI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5616. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Abstract

The most adequate approach for benchmarking web accessibility is manual expert evaluation supplemented by automatic analysis tools. But manual evaluation has a high cost and is impractical to be applied on large web sites. In reality, there is no choice but to rely on automated tools when reviewing large web sites for accessibility. The question is: to what extent the results from automatic evaluation of a web site and individual web pages can be used as an approximation for manual results? This paper presents the initial results of an investigation aimed at answering this question. He have performed both manual and automatic evaluations of the accessibility of web pages of two sites and we have compared the results. In our data set automatically retrieved results could most definitely be used as an approximation manual evaluation results.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Casado Martínez
    • 1
  • Loïc Martínez-Normand
    • 2
  • Morten Goodwin Olsen
    • 3
  1. 1.Universitat Oberta de CatalunyaSpain
  2. 2.DLSIISUniversidad Politécnica de MadridSpain
  3. 3.Tingtun ASLillesandNorway

Personalised recommendations