Using Distributed Processing to Create More Powerful, Flexible and User Matched Accessibility Services

  • Gregg C. Vanderheiden
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5615)

Abstract

Accessibility today is characterized by individual devices, which have been custom-built for people with disabilities (talking alarm clock, braille watches, special communication devices, etc.) or mainstream devices such as computers, which have been adapted with hardware or software to be usable by an individual with disabilities. This model results in more isolated access packages whose capabilities are limited by the particular devices on which they are run. By moving to more distributed, network-based accessibility solutions, we open up the potential for a much wider range of accessibility solutions which can not only evolve over time, but vary by environment, task, etc. A rainbow of on-demand services and capabilities can be available to them. It also opens up the potential for individuals who cannot afford assistive technologies to be able to tap into a pool of free public assistive services that they can use on any device which they encounter.

Keywords

Web accessibility services on demand virtual AT ubiquitous accessibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hanson, V.L., Richards, J.T.: Achieving a usable World Wide Web. Behaviour and Information Technology 24(3), 231–246 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borodin, Y., Mahmud, J., Ramakrishnan, I.V., Stent, A.: The HearSay non-visual web browser. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), vol. 225, pp. 128–129 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mahmud, J.U., Borodin, Y., Ramakrishnan, I.V.: CSurf: A context-driven non-visual web-browser. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 31–40. ACM Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erra, U., Iaccarino, G., Malandrino, D., Scarano, V.: Personalizable edge services for Web accessibility. Universal Access in the Information Society 6(3), 285–306 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, A.W., Sundaresan, N.: Aurora: A conceptual model for web-content adaptation to support the universal usability of web-based services. In: Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 124–131. ACM Press, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fairweather, P.G., Richards, J.T., Hanson, V.L.: Distributed accessibility control points to help deliver a directly accessible Web. Universal Access in the Information Society 2(1), 70–75 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanson, V.L., Richards, J.T.: Achieving a usable World Wide Web. Behaviour and Information Technology 24(3), 231–246 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parmanto, B., Ferrydiansyah, R., Zeng, X., Saptono, A., Sugiantara, I.W.: Accessibility transformation gateway. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 07, p. 183. 1. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bigham, J.P., Prince, C.M.: WebAnywhere: A screen reader on-the-go. In: Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 225–226. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seeman, L.: The semantic web, web accessibility, and device independence. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), vol. 63, pp. 67–73 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bigham, J.P.: Accessmonkey: enabling and sharing end user accessibility improvements. ACM SIGACCESS Newsletter: Accessibility and Computing 89, 3–6 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bigham, J.P., Ladner, R.E.: Accessmonkey: a collaborative scripting framework for web users and developers. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4a), vol. 225, pp. 25–34. ACM Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, C.L., Raman, T.V.: AxsJAX: a talking translation bot using google IM: bringing web-2.0 applications to life. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4a), vol. 317, pp. 54–56. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cooper, M., Treviranus, J., Heath, A.: Meeting the diversity of needs and preferences – a look at the IMS AccessForAll specifications’ role in meeting the accessibility agenda efficiently. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Accessible Design in the Digital World Conference, https://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_ad05_workshop3.pdf (2-15-09)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregg C. Vanderheiden
    • 1
  1. 1.Trace R&D CenterUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison, WiUSA

Personalised recommendations