Advertisement

Emphasizing the ‘Social’ in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Social Work Perspective

  • Dyann Ross
Chapter

Abstract

Social work is a profession that stands for social justice and protection of human rights for individuals, communities and societies. As such it has an invaluable knowledge and skills set that can inform debates and practice in the area of CSR. The paper will draw indirectly on lessons derived from research, funded by a multi-national mining company in regional Western Australia, to address conflict between the company and an impacted neighbouring community. Social work knowledge directed the research towards enabling dialogue and mutual respect, with due attention to power issues and the need for social justice for people and sustainability for the local environment. Profit unhinged from these parallel considerations of people and place threatens sustainability as well as social justice.

A key insight is the creative potential of stakeholder relationships in collaboratively dialoguing about the conflict to find common ground and ways forward. Legalistic strategies, media coverage and government policies and inquiries were inadequate to address the conflict. Local supported dialogues with company managers and impacted people can make a difference for the better. This difference for the better has important implications for CSR being a public responsibility, not solely owned and driven by corporations or government. Additionally, the social dimension of sustainability concerns contains the creative potential when competing agendas, conflict and power issues are embraced.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Social Work Social Justice Corporate Philanthropy Power Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AASW, 2002. Code of ethics. Barton: Australian Association of Social Workers.Google Scholar
  2. Achbar, M., 2003. The corporation. England: Metrodome Distributions.Google Scholar
  3. Alcoa World Alumina Australia, 2002. Visions and values: Principles. [Online]. Available at: http://www.alcoa.com.au/governance/values.shtml. [accessed 11th September 2002].
  4. Alcoa World Alumina Australia, 2006. Partnering stronger communities. [Online]. Available at: http://www.alcoa.com/australia/en/info_page/partnering_stronger_communities.asp. [accessed 29th August 2008].
  5. Axelrod, R., 1997. The complexity of co-operation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brueckner, M., 2007. The western Australian regional forest agreement: economic rationalism and the normalisation of political closure. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(2), 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brueckner, M. and Ross, D., 2010. Under corporatised skies: A struggle between people, place and profit. Perth: Fremantle Arts Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bunbury H., 2005. Helping build a sustainable future. Mining and Minerals Supplement. Bunbury: South Western Times Newspapers, p. 136.Google Scholar
  9. Carson, R., 1962. Silent spring. Boston: Hougthon Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Chetkow-Yanoov, B., 1997. Social work approaches to conflict resolution. New York: Hawthorn Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, S., 2004. Corporate social performance: A stakeholder approach. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Dunphy, D. and Benveniste, J., 2000. An introduction to the sustainable corporation. In D. Dunphy, J. Benveniste, A. Griffiths, and P. Sutton (Eds.), Sustainability: The corporate challenge of the 21st century. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  13. Dunphy, D. and Griffiths, A., 1998. The sustainable corporation: Organizational renewal in Australia. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. Fook, J., 2000. Social work in changing times: new ways for new challenges. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Social Workers, State Branch Conference, Bunbury: AASW.Google Scholar
  15. Fox, C. and Miller, H., 1995. Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Freire, P., 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
  17. Goldie, J., Douglas, B., and Furnass, B. (Eds.), 2005. In search of sustainability. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Grayson, D. and Hodges, A., 2004. Corporate social opportunity: 7 steps to make corporate social responsibility work for your business. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Hahn, T. 2002. In the loop. A video. Bunbury: Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
  20. Hemmati, M., 2002. Multi-stakeholders processes for governance and sustainability – Beyond deadlock and conflict. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  21. Holliday, C., Schidheiny, S. and Watts, P., 2002. Walking the talk: The business case for sustainable development. San Francisco: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. hooks, b., 1994. Outlaw culture: Resisting representations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. hooks, b., 2000a. All about love. London: New Visions.Google Scholar
  24. hooks, b., 2000b. Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ife, J. and Tesoriero, F., 2006. Community development: Community based alternatives in an age of globalism, 3rd edition. French’s Forest: Pearson Education Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Kelly, A. and Sewell, S., 1988. With head, heart and hand: Dimensions of community building, 2nd edition. Bowen Hills, Qld: Boolarong.Google Scholar
  27. Kenny, S., 2006. Developing communities for the future, 3rd edition. South Melbourne: Nelson Thompson Learning.Google Scholar
  28. Lagan, A., 2000. Why ethics matter: Business ethics for business people. Melbourne: Information Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (MMSD), 2002a. Breaking new ground. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  30. Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (MMSD), 2002b. Seven questions to sustainability: How to assess the contribution of mining and minerals activities. Winnipeg: IISD.Google Scholar
  31. Muirhead, T., 2002. Weaving tapestries: A handbook for building communities. Mt. Hawthorn: Local Government Community Services Association.Google Scholar
  32. Mullaly, B., 1997. Structural social work: Ideology, theory and practice. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Newman, P. and Rowe, M., 2003. Hope for the future: The Western Australian state sustainability strategy. Perth: State Government of W.A.Google Scholar
  34. Pettman, J., 1992. Living in the margins: Racism, sexism and feminism in Australia. North Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. Porter, M. and Kramer, M., 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. [Online]. Available at: Harvard Business Review On Point, December. [accessed 29th August, 2008].Google Scholar
  36. Rawls, J., 1973. A theory of justice. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rees, S. and Wright, S. (Eds.), 2000. Human rights, corporate responsibility: A dialogue. Sydney: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rio T., 2006. [Online]. Riotinto.com.partnerships. asp. Available at: http://www.wafuture fund. [accessed 29th August, 2008).
  39. Ross, D., 2002. Enacting my theory and politics of an ethic of love in social work education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bunbury: Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
  40. Sandman, P., 2002a. Laundry list of 50 outrage reducers. [Online]. Available at: http://www.psandman.com/col/laundry.htm. [accessed 7th November, 2003].
  41. Sandman, P., 2002b. Accountability. [Online]. Available at: http://www.psandman.com/col/account.htm. [accessed 7th December, 2004].
  42. Sharp, C., 2004. Report for the standing committee on environment & public affairs in relation to the Alcoa refinery at Wagerup Inquiry. Perth: Government of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  43. Shell, 2006. Everyone’s a winner. Impact. Issue 2; p. 18. [Online]. Available at: http://www.shell.com/globalsolutions. [accessed 7th December, 2004].
  44. Solas, J., 2008. Social work & social justice: What are we fighting for? Australian Social Work, 61(2), pp. 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sonn, C., Drew, N., and Kasat, P., 2002. Conceptualising community cultural development: The role of cultural planning in community change. Cloister’s Square: Community Arts Network.Google Scholar
  46. Svendsen, A., 2008. Co-creative stakeholder engagement. Melbourne: Australian Centre for CSR, 1st & 2nd May.Google Scholar
  47. Titmus, R., 1970. The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  48. Tennyson, R., 2003. The partnering toolbook. [Online]. Available at: http://www.google.com.au/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ADBF_enAU233AU233&q=The+partnering+toolbook. [accessed 29th august, 2008].
  49. Tennyson, R. and Wilde, L., 2000. The guiding hand: Brokering partnerships for sustainable development. Geneva: United Nations Office of Public Information.Google Scholar
  50. Young, I.M., 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Young, I.M., 1995. Communication and the other. In Wilson, M. and Yeatman, A. (Eds.), Beyond deliberative justice and identity: Antipodean democracy practices. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.Google Scholar
  52. Zadek, S., 2001. The civil corporation: The new economy of corporate citizenship. London & Stirling: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dyann Ross
    • 1
  1. 1.Edith Cowan UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations