Kin recognition: an overview of conceptual issues, mechanisms and evolutionary theory

  • Dustin J. Penn
  • Joachim G. Frommen
Chapter

Abstract

Kin recognition (KR) is the ability to identify or distinguish kin from nonkin, and it is thought to be an important driving force in the evolution of social and sexual behaviour. Here, we provide an introduction to KR, including an overview of the main debates, the underlying mechanisms and evolutionary analyses. First, we examine the many evolving definitions for KR, as these have caused some confusion and debate. We explain why retaining both broad and narrow definitions can be instructive for thinking about the problem. Second, we provide examples of the different types of KR from empirical studies, ranging from the use of spatial cues to selfinspection and green-beard genes. We also suggest a classification scheme of the different mechanisms based on whether they are considered to be KR in the broad or in the narrow sense. Third, we consider the key components necessary for most or all KR mechanisms, and explain why the central problem for any recognition mechanism is to balance the risk of acceptance versus rejection errors. Fourth, we summarise theoretical analyses addressing the evolution of nepotism through kin recognition, and the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms controlling KR. Fifth, we examine evolutionary analyses of apparent KR failures, errors, and mistakes. Finally, we suggest some of the main challenges that need to be addressed in future KR research.

Keywords

Major Histocompatibility Complex Conceptual Issue Major Histocompatibility Complex Gene Behav Ecol Phenotype Match 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander RD, Borgia G (1978) Group selection, altruism, and the levels of organization of life. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:449-474Google Scholar
  2. Antal T, Ohtsuki H, Wakeley J, Taylor PD, Nowak MA (2009) Evolution of cooperation by phenotypic similarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8597-8600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Axelrod R, Hammond RA, Grafen A (2004) Altruism via kin-selection strategies that rely on arbitrary tags with which they coevolve. Evolution 58:1833-1838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnard CJ (1991) Kinship and social behavior: the trouble with relatives. Trends Ecol Evol 6:310-312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnard CJ, Hurst JL, Aldhous P (1991) Of mice and kin: the functional significance of kin bias in social behavior. Biol Rev 66:379-430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beecher MD (1991) Success and failures of parent-offspring recognition in animals. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 95-124Google Scholar
  7. Beecher MD, Beecher IM, Hahn S (1981) Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows (Riparia riparia). II. Development and acoustic basis. Anim Behav 29:95-101Google Scholar
  8. Blaustein AR, Bekoff M, Byers JA, Daniels TJ (1991) Kin recognition in vertebrates: what do we really know about adaptive value? Anim Behav 41:1079-1083Google Scholar
  9. Bressan P, Zucchi G (2009) Human kin recognition is self-rather than familyreferential. Biol Lett 5:336-338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JL, Eklund A (1994) Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review. Am Nat 143:435-461Google Scholar
  11. Byers JA, Bekoff M (1986) What does ‘kin recognition’ mean? Ethology 72:342-345Google Scholar
  12. Byers JA, Bekoff M (1991) Development, the conveniently forgotten variable in ‘true kin recognition’. Anim Behav 41:1088-1090Google Scholar
  13. Clarke FM, Faulkes CG (1999) Kin discrimination and female mate choice in the naked mole-rat Heterocephalus glaber. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1995-2002Google Scholar
  14. Crampton WGR, Hurst LD (1994) True kin recognition, in the form of somatic incompatibility, has multiple independent origins. Anim Behav 47:230-234Google Scholar
  15. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260-270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Crozier RH (1986) Genetic clonal recognition abilities in marine invertebrates must be maintained by selection for something else. Evolution 40:1100-1101Google Scholar
  17. Crozier RH (1987) Genetic aspects of kin recognition: concepts, models, and synthesis. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (eds) Kin Recognition in Animals. Wiley, New York, pp 55-73Google Scholar
  18. Davies NB, Hatchwell BJ, Robson T, Burke T (1992) Paternity and parental effort in dunnocks Prunella modularis – how good are male chick-feeding rules. Anim Behav 43:729-745Google Scholar
  19. Dawkins R (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Dawkins R (1979) Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Z Tierpsychol 51:184-200Google Scholar
  21. Dawkins R (1982) The Extended Phenotype: the Gene as the Unit of Selection. WH Freeman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. DeBruine LM (2002) Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1307-1312Google Scholar
  23. Dewsbury DA (1982) Avoidance of incestuous breeding between siblings in two species of Peromyscus mice. Biol Behav 7:157-169Google Scholar
  24. Dudley SA, File AL (2007) Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biol Lett 3:435-438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Elwood RW, Ostermeyer MC (1984) Does copulation inhibit infanticide in male rodents? Anim Behav 32:293-294Google Scholar
  26. Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (1987) Kin Recognition in Animals. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Frommen JG, Luz C, Bakker TCM (2007a) Kin discrimination in sticklebacks is mediated by social learning rather than innate recognition. Ethology 113:276-282Google Scholar
  28. Frommen JG, Mehlis M, Brendler C, Bakker TCM (2007b) Shoaling decisions in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) – familiarity, kinship and inbreeding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:533-539Google Scholar
  29. Galef BG Jr (1976) Social transmission of acquired behavior: a discussion of tradition and social learning in vertebrates. Adv Stud Behav 6:77-100Google Scholar
  30. Gamboa GJ, Reeve HK, Holmes WG (1991) Conceptual issues and methodology in kin-ecognition research: a critical discussion. Ethology 88:109-127Google Scholar
  31. Gardner A, West SA (2007) Social evolution: the decline and fall of genetic kin recognition. Curr Biol 17:R810-R812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4-15Google Scholar
  33. Grafen A (1990) Do animals really recognise kin? Anim Behav 39:42-54Google Scholar
  34. Grafen A (1991a) Kin vision? A reply to Stuart. Anim Behav 41:1095-1096Google Scholar
  35. Grafen A (1991b) A reply to Blaustein et al. Anim Behav 41:1085-1087Google Scholar
  36. Grafen A (1991c) A reply to Byers and Bekoff. Anim Behav 41:1091-1092Google Scholar
  37. Griffin AS, West SA (2002) Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends Ecol Evol 17:15-21Google Scholar
  38. Grosberg RK, Quinn JF (1986) The genetic control and consequences of kin recognition by larvae of a colonial marine invertebrate. Nature 322:456-459Google Scholar
  39. Haig D (1996) Gestational drive and the green-bearded placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6547-6551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Halpin ZT (1986) Individual odors among mammals: origins and functions. Adv Stud Behav 16:39-70Google Scholar
  41. Halpin ZT (1991) Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 220-258Google Scholar
  42. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J Theor Biol 7:1-16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hamilton WD (1975) Innate social aptitudes of man: an approachfrom evolutionary genetics. In: Fox R (ed) ASA Studies 4: Biosocial Anthropology. Malaby Press, London, pp 133-153Google Scholar
  44. Hamilton WD (1996) Narrow Roads of Gene Land. WH Freeman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Hare JF, Sealy SG, Underwood TJ, Ellison KS, Stewart RLM (2002) Evidence of self-referent phenotype matching revisited: airing out the armpit effect. Anim Cogn 6:65-68Google Scholar
  46. Hartley IR, Davies NB, Hatchwell BJ, Desrochers A, Nebel D, Burke T (1995) The polygynandrous mating system of the alpine accentor, Prunella collaris. II. Multiple paternity and parental effort. Anim Behav 49:789-803Google Scholar
  47. Helanterä H, Bargum K (2007) Pedigree relatedness, not greenbeard genes, explains eusociality. Oikos 116:217-220Google Scholar
  48. Hepper PG (1991a) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Hepper PG (1991b) Recognizing kin: ontogeny and classification. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 259-288Google Scholar
  50. Heth G, Todrank J (2001) Self referencing in hamsters: comment from Heth and Todrank. Trends Ecol Evol 16:74Google Scholar
  51. Holmes WG (2004) The early history of Hamiltonian-based research on kin recognition. Ann Zool Fennici 41:691-711Google Scholar
  52. Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1982) The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. Am Zool 22:491-517Google Scholar
  53. Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition in animals. Am Sci 71:46-55Google Scholar
  54. Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320:1213-1216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Jansen VAA, van Baalen M (2006) Altruism through beard chromodynamics. Nature 440:663-666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Johnstone RA (1997) Recognition and the evolution of distinctive signatures: when does it pay to reveal identity? Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1547-1553Google Scholar
  57. Keller L, Ross KG (1998) Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant. Nature 394:573-575Google Scholar
  58. Kempenaers B, Sheldon BC (1996) Why do male birds not discriminate between their own and extra-pair offspring? Anim Behav 51:1165-1173Google Scholar
  59. Kuester J, Paul A, Arnemann J (1994) Kinship, familiarity and mating avoidance in Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Anim Behav 48:1183-1194Google Scholar
  60. Lacy RC, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition by phenotype matching. Am Nat 121:489-512Google Scholar
  61. Leinders-Zufall T, Brennan P, Widmayer P, Chandramani P, Maul-Pavicic A, Jager M, Li X-H, Breer H, Zufall F, Boehm T (2004) MHC class I peptides as chemosensory signals in the vomeronasal organ. Science 306:1033-1037PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Lieberman D, Tooby J, Cosmides L (2007) The architecture of human kin detection. Nature 445:727-731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Liebert AE, Starks PT (2004) The action component of recognition systems: a focus on the response. Ann Zool Fennici 41:747-764Google Scholar
  64. Manica A (2002) Filial cannibalism in teleost fish. Biol Rev 77:261-277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Potts WK (1992) Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature 360:581-583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Mateo JM (2004) Recognition systems and biological organization: the perception component of social recognition. Ann Zool Fennici 41:729-745Google Scholar
  67. Mateo JM, Johnston RE (2000) Kin recognition and the ‘armpit effect’: evidence of self-referent phenotype matching. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:695-700Google Scholar
  68. Mateo JM, Johnston RE (2001) Self referencing in hamsters: reply from Hauber and Sherman. Trends Ecol Evol 16:74-75Google Scholar
  69. Mateo JM, Johnston RE (2003) Kin recognition by self-referent phenotype matching: weighing the evidence. Anim Cogn 6:73-76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. McRae SB (1996) Family values: costs and benefits of communal nesting in the moorhen. Anim Behav 52:225-245Google Scholar
  71. Milinski M (2006) The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:159-186Google Scholar
  72. Moore T, Moore HD (2002) Marsupial sperm pairing: a case of ‘sticky’ green beards? Trends Ecol Evol 17:112-113Google Scholar
  73. Müller JK, Eggert A-K (1990) Time-dependent shifts between infanticidal and parental behavior in female burying beetles: a mechanism of indirect motheroffspring recognition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:11-16Google Scholar
  74. Neff BD, Sherman PW (2002) Decision making and recognition mechanisms. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1435-1441Google Scholar
  75. Novotny MV, Soini HA, Koyama S, Wiesler D, Bruce KE, Penn DJ (2007) Chemical identification of MHC-influenced volatile compounds in mouse urine. I: quantitative proportions of major chemosignals. J Chem Ecol 33:417-434PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Pagel M (1997) Desperately concealing father: a theory of parent-infant resemblance. Anim Behav 53:973-981Google Scholar
  77. Penn DJ (2002) The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 108:1-21Google Scholar
  78. Penn DJ, Potts WK (1998) MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1299-1306Google Scholar
  79. Penn DJ, Potts WK (1999) The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am Nat 153:145-164Google Scholar
  80. Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Potts WK (2002) MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11260-11264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Petrie M, Krupa A, Burke T (1999) Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature 401:155-157Google Scholar
  82. Pfennig DW, Reeve HK, Sherman PW (1993) Kin recognition and cannibalism in spadefoot toad tadpoles. Anim Behav 46:87-94Google Scholar
  83. Porter RH (1988) The ontogeny of sibling recognition in rodents: superfamily Muroidea. Behav Gen 18:483-494Google Scholar
  84. Porter RH (1991) Mutual mother-infant recognition in humans. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 413-432Google Scholar
  85. Porter RH, Tepper VJ, White DM (1981) Experimental influence on the development of huddling preferences and ‘sibling’ recognition in spiny mice. Dev Psychobiol 14:375-382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Queller DC, Ponte E, Bozzaro S, Strassmann JE (2003) Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Science 299:105-106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Reeve HK (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat 133:407-435Google Scholar
  88. Reeve HK, Sherman PW (2001) Optimality and phylogeny: a critique of current thought. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and Optimality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 64-113Google Scholar
  89. Ridley M, Grafen A (1981) Are green beard genes outlaws? Anim Behav 29:954-955Google Scholar
  90. Rousset F, Roze D (2007) Constraints on the origin and maintenance of genetic kin recognition. Evolution 61:2320-2330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Schausberger P (2007) Kin recognition by juvenile predatory mites: prior association or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:119-125Google Scholar
  92. Sherman PW, Holmes WG (1985) Kin recognition: issues and evidence. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 437-460Google Scholar
  93. Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 69-98Google Scholar
  94. Sinervo B, Chaine A, Clobert J, Calsbeek R, Hazard L, Lancaster L, McAdam AG, Alonzo S, Corrigan G, Hochberg ME (2006) Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7372-7377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Smukalla S, Caldara M, Pochet N, Beauvais A, Guadagnini S, Yan C, Vinces MD, Jansen A, Prevost MC, Latge J-P, Fink GR, Foster KR, Verstrepen KJ (2008) FLO1 is a variable green beard gene that drives biofilm-like cooperation in budding yeast. Cell 135:726-737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Stuart RJ (1991) Kin recognition as a functional concept. Anim Behav 41:1093-1094Google Scholar
  97. Summers K, Crespi B (2005) Cadherins in maternal-foetal interactions: red queen with a green beard? Proc R Soc Lond B 272:643-649Google Scholar
  98. Tang-Martinez Z (2001) The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation. Behav Proc 53:21-40Google Scholar
  99. Thünken T, Bakker TCM, Baldauf SA, Kullmann H (2007a) Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance. Curr Biol 17:225-229Google Scholar
  100. Thünken T, Bakker TCM, Baldauf SA, Kullmann H (2007b) Direct familiarity does not alter mating preference for sisters in male Pelvicachromis taeniatus (Cichlidae). Ethology 113:1107-1112Google Scholar
  101. Todrank J, Heth G (2003) Odor-genes covariance and genetic relatedness assessments: rethinking odor-based ‘recognition’ mechanisms in rodents. Adv Stud Behav 32:77-130Google Scholar
  102. Tsutsui ND (2004) Scents of self: the expression component of self/nonself recognition systems. Ann Zool Fennici 41:713-727Google Scholar
  103. van der Jeugd HP, van der Veen IT, Larsson K (2002) Kin clustering in barnacle geese: familiarity or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol 13:786-790Google Scholar
  104. Vander Meer RK, Alonso LE (2002) Queen primer pheromone affects conspecific fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) aggression. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:122-130Google Scholar
  105. Villinger J, Waldman B (2008) Self-referent MHC type matching in frog tadpoles. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:1225-1230Google Scholar
  106. Waldman B (1987) Mechanisms of kin recognition. J Theor Biol 128:159-185Google Scholar
  107. Waldman B (1988) The ecology of kin recognition. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:543-571Google Scholar
  108. Waldman B, Frumhoff PC, Sherman PW (1988) Problems of kin recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 3:8-13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS (2002) Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296:72-75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Westermarck EA (1891) The History of Human Marriage. Macmillian, LondonGoogle Scholar
  111. Willse A, Belcher AM, Preti G, Wahl JH, Thresher M, Yang P, Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK (2005) Identification of major histocompatibility complexregulated body odorants by statistical analysis of a comparative gas chromatography/mass spectrometry experiment. Anal Chem 77:2348-2361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Willse A, Kwak J, Yamazaki K, Preti G, Wahl JH, Beauchamp GK (2006) Individual odortypes: interaction of MHC and background genes. Immunogenetics 58:967-982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Havard University Press, Cambridge/MAGoogle Scholar
  114. Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  115. Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Kupniewski D, Bard J, Thomas L, Boyse EA (1988) Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Science 240:1331-1332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Curran M, Bard J, Boyse EA (2000) Parentprogeny recognition as a function of MHC odortype identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10500-10502PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dustin J. Penn
    • 1
  • Joachim G. Frommen
    • 1
  1. 1.Konrad Lorenz Institute for EthologyAustrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations