Three Dimensional Segmentation of Intravascular Ultrasound Data

  • Marc Wennogle
  • William Hoff
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5627)


Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a useful imaging technique that can be used to assess the health of coronary arteries. However, manual segmentation of the lumen and adventia boundaries is a time consuming process. Automated methods are needed, but they have to be able to overcome poor signal-to-noise ratios and artifacts commonly present in IVUS images. In this work, three improvements to previous methods were developed and evaluated. These were: (1) a preprocessing step to remove motion artifacts, (2) a new directional gradient velocity term, and (3) a post-processing level-set method. Two IVUS cardiac datasets were used to evaluate the accuracy of the new method over the 3D gradient fast marching method. The new methods, both individually and in combination, were found to significantly lower the volume error.


Biomedical imaging IVUS ultrasound segmentation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Klingensmith, J., Shekhar, R., Vince, D.G.: Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Segmentation Algorithms for the Identification of Luminal and Medial-Adventitial Borders in Intravascular Ultrasound Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 19(10), 996–1011 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klingensmith, J., et al.: Validation of an Automated System for Luminal and Medial-Adventitial Borders Detection in Three Dimensional Intravascular Ultrasound. Int’l J. of Cardiovascular Imaging 19(2), 93–104 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kovalski, G., Beyar, R., Shofti, R., Azhari, H.: Three-Dimensional Automatic Quantitative Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound Images. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 26(4), 527–537 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shekhar, R., et al.: Three-dimensional Segmentation of Luminal and Adventitial Borders In Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Images. Computerized Medical Imaging & Graphics 23(6), 299–309 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Dynamic snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision 1(4), 321–331 (1988)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cardinal, M., Meunier, J., Soulez, G., Therasse, E., Cloutier, G.: Intravascular Ultrasound Image Segmentation A Fast-Marching Method. In: Ellis, R.E., Peters, T.M. (eds.) MICCAI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2879, pp. 432–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cardinal, M., Soulez, G., Maurice, R., Therasse, E., Cloutier, G.: Intravascular Ultrasound Image Segmentation: A Three-Dimensional Fast-Marching Method Based on Gray Level Distributions. IEEE Transactions On Medical Imaging 25(5), 590–601 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hernandez, A., Radeva, P., Tovar, A., Gil, D.: Vessel Structures Alignment by Spectral Analysis of IVUS Sequences. In: The 1st International Workshop on Computer Vision for Intravascular and Intracardiac Imaging, Copenhagen, Denmark (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sethian, J.: Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sarti, A., et al.: A Unified Geometric Model for 3D Confocal Image Analysis in Cytology. In: Proc. of the Int’l Symp. Computer Graphics, Image Processing, and Vision, p. 69 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dicker, J.: Fast Marching Methods and Level Set Methods: An Implementation. Ph.D. Thesis: University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Wennogle
    • 1
  • William Hoff
    • 2
  1. 1.Veran Medical TechnologiesNashville
  2. 2.Colorado School of MinesGolden

Personalised recommendations