HCI 2009: Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains pp 741-750 | Cite as
Allocating Human-System Interfaces Functions by Levels of Automation in an Advanced Control Room
Abstract
Human factors engineering (HFE) focuses on the design of human-system interfaces (HSIs). The HSIs, those NPPs parts that personnel interact with in performing their tasks, included control switches, red, green, amber, and white indictor lights, mimic displays, lighted annunciator panels, and hand-written status boards. The advanced technology has introduced the capability of integrating information from numerous plant systems and supplying needed information to operations personnel in a timely manner. Challenges of the well-integrated computerized control room include ensuring reduced staffing does not treat with increased task complexity, achieving a consistent user interface, ensuring increased automation does not adversely affect the operator’s mental model of the plant, and systems actually support the operator. This study investigated the process of the HSI functions allocation by considering which functions should be automated and to what extent, which is also called the level of automation (LOA).
Keywords
Human factors engineering human-system interface nuclear power plants type of automation level of automationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC), NUREG-0711, Rev. 2, Human factors engineering program review model, USNRC, Washington D.C (2004)Google Scholar
- 2.Brookhaven National Laboratory, http://www.bnl.gov/humanfactors/default.asp
- 3.U.K. Ministry of Defense, http://www.ams.mod.uk/aofcontent/tactical/hfi/index.htm
- 4.Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors 37(2), 381–394 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Billings, C.E.: Human-centred aircraft automation: A concept and guidelines (NASA Tech. Memo. No. 103885), NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, CA (1991)Google Scholar
- 6.Billings, C.E.: Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centered Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah (1997)Google Scholar
- 7.Kaber, D.B.: The Effect of Level of Automation and Adaptive Automation on Performance in Dynamic Control Environments, Tech. Work. Doc. No. ANRCP-NGITWD-97-01. Amarillo National Resource Center for Plutonium, Amarillo, TX (1997)Google Scholar
- 8.Endsley, M.R., Kaber, D.B.: Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics 42, 462–492 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 30(3), 286–297 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kaber, D.B., Endsley, M.R.: The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5(2), 113–153 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., Parasuraman, R.: Automation-induced monitoring inefficiency: role of display location. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46(1), 17–30 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC), Digital Instrumentation & Controls (DI&C-ISG-05) Task Working Group #5: Highly-Integrated Control Rooms—Human Factors Issues (HICR—HF) Interim Staff Guidance Rev. 1, USNRC, Washington D.C (2008)Google Scholar
- 13.Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)Google Scholar