Studying Reactive, Risky, Complex, Long-Spanning, and Collaborative Work: The Case of IT Service Delivery
IT service delivery is challenging to study. It is characterized by interacting systems of technology, people, and organizations. The work is sometimes reactive, sometimes carefully planned, often risky, and always complex and collaborative. In this paper we describe how we’ve learned about IT work, using a variety of methods including naturalistic observations, contextual interviews, surveys, and diary studies. We provide examples of our study results, showing what we’ve learned with the different methods. We argue that to effectively study such systems, a variety of methods may be needed to complement insights and validate findings. We found that naturalistic observations were extremely time and labor intensive, yet offered us the time and space to observe unplanned events and long-lasting tasks, bringing out the full complexity and risks involved in real work. Contextual interviews and diary studies provided fewer details, yet gave a broader context to individual’s work. Surveys provided an even broader picture, going beyond individual differences, yet they were limited by details and issues of sampling.
KeywordsCollaborative Work System Administrator Diary Study Naturalistic Observation Ethnographic Approach
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Barrett, R., Kandogan, E., Maglio, P.P., Haber, E., Takayama, L., Prabaker, M.: Field Studies of Computer System Administrators: Analysis of System Management Tools and Practices. In: Proc. of the CSCW 2004, pp. 388–395. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
- 2.Dourish, P.: Responsibilities and implications: further thoughts on ethnography and design. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing For User Experiences (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Norman, D.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books (2004)Google Scholar
- 6.Takayama, L., Kandogan, E.: Trust as an underlying factor of system administrator interface choice. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1391–1396. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar