Relationship Learning Software: Design and Assessment

  • Kyla A. McMullen
  • Gregory H. Wakefield
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5612)


Interface designers have been studying how to construct graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for a number of years, however adults are often the main focus of these studies. Children constitute a unique user group, making it necessary to design software specifically for them. For this study, several interface design frameworks were combined to synthesize a framework for designing educational software for children. Two types of learning, relationships and categories, are the focus of the present study because of their importance in early-child learning as well as standardized testing. For this study the educational game Melo’s World was created as an experimental platform. The experiments assessed the performance differences found when including or excluding subsets of interface design features, specifically aesthetic and behavioral features. Software that contains aesthetic, but lack behavioral features, was found to have the greatest positive impact on a child’s learning of thematic relationships.


human computer interaction educational technology interactive systems design user interface design 


  1. 1.
    Benware, C.A., Deci, E.L.: Quality of Learning with an Active versus Passive Motivational Set. American Educational Research Journal 21, 755–765 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berman, R.A.: Preschool knowledge of language: What five-year olds know about language structure and language use. In: Pontecorvo, C. (ed.) Writing development: An interdisciplinary view, pp. 61–76. John Benjamin’s Publishing, Amsteredam (1977)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buckleitner, W.: The relationship between software interface instructional style and the engagement of young children. Phd Dissertation, Michigan State University (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chi, M.T.H., Koeske, R.D.: Network representation of a child’s dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology 19, 29–39 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clanton, C.: An Interpreted Demonstration of Computer Game Design. In: CHI 1998 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–2 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deibel, K., Anderson, R., Anderson, R.E.: Using edit distance to analyze card sorts. Expert Systems 22(3), 129–138 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gelderblom, H.: Designing software for young children: theoretically grounded guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on interaction Design and Children: Building A Community, pp. 121–122 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hegarty, M., Quilici, J., Narayanan, N.H., Holmquist, S., Moreno, R.: Designing multimedia manuals that explain how machines work: Lessons from evaluation of a theory-based design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 8, 119–150 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones, M.K.: Human-computer interaction: A design guide. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs (1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Markman, E.: Categorization and Naming in Children. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, pp. 249–256 (1990)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norman, D.A.: Emotion and attractive Interactions 9(4), 36–42 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palmer, J.: Pre-School Education, Pros. and Cons. A Survey of Pre-School education with Emphasis on Research Past, Present, and Future. Toronto Board of Education, Ontario (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park, I., Hannafin, M.J.: Empirically based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia. Educational Technology Research and Development 41(3), 63–85 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schank, R.C.: Active learning through multimedia. IEEE Multimedia 1(1), 69–78 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wyche, L.G.: Conceptualization Processes in Third Grade Black Children. The Journal of Negro Education 49(4), 373–384 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyla A. McMullen
    • 1
  • Gregory H. Wakefield
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations