Touchless Interaction-Novel Chances and Challenges

  • René de la Barré
  • Paul Chojecki
  • Ulrich Leiner
  • Lothar Mühlbach
  • Detlef Ruschin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5611)

Abstract

Touchless or empty-handed gestural input has received considerable attention during the last years because of such benefits as removing the burden of physical contact with an interactive system and making the interaction pleasurable. What is often overlooked is that those special forms of touchless interaction which employ genuine gestures –  defined as movements that have a meaning – are associated with the danger of suffering from the same drawbacks as command based interfaces do, which have been widely abandoned in favor of direct manipulation interfaces. Touchless direct manipulation, however, is about to reach maturity in certain application fields. In our paper we try to point out why and under which conditions this is going to happen, and how we are working to optimize the interfaces through user tests.

Keywords

interaction touchless direct manipulation gestures hand tracking user experience 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shneiderman, B.: Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer 16(8), 57–69 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cadoz, C.: Les réalités virtuelles. Dominos, Flammarion (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mulder, A.: Hand gestures for hci. Technical report, Hand Centered Studies of Human Movement Project, Simon Fraser University (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kendon, A.: Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nelson, T.: Interactive systems and the design of virtuality. Creative Computing 6(11), 56–62 (1980)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shneiderman, B.: Beyond intelligent machines: Just Do It! IEEE Software 10(1), 100–103 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Searle, J.: Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, New York (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de la Barré, R., Pastoor, S.: Conomis, Ch., Przewozny, D., Renault, S., Stachel, O., Duckstein, B., Schenke, K.: Natural Interaction in a desktop Mixed Reality environment. In: 6th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services WIAMIS 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Varona, J., Jaume-i-Capó, A., Gonzàlez, J., Perales, F.J.: Toward natural interaction through visual recognition of body gestures in real-time. Interacting with Computers 21(1), 3–10 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNeill, D.: Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cassel, J.: A Frameworkfor gesture generation and interpretation. In: Cipolla, R., Pentland, A. (eds.) Computer Vision for Human-Machine Interaction, pp. 191–215. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Application Gestures and Semantic Behavior (Windows), http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms704830VS.85.aspx
  13. 13.
    Saffer, D.: Designing Gestural Interfaces. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hassenzahl, M.: Hedonic, emotional, and experiential perspectives on product quality. In: Ghaoui, C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, pp. 266–272. Idea Group, Hershey (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • René de la Barré
    • 1
  • Paul Chojecki
    • 1
  • Ulrich Leiner
    • 1
  • Lothar Mühlbach
    • 1
  • Detlef Ruschin
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Communication TechnologiesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations