Advertisement

Application of Population Stereotypes to Computerized Tasks

  • Jeff Wiebe
  • Kim-Phuong L. Vu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5617)

Abstract

Control-display configurations are the primary means by which people interact with machines and equipment. Regardless of the level of complexity, these configurations should be designed in accordance with the preferred responses of the user population to achieve a successful interaction. These responses are known as population stereotypes. This study examined whether mouse-click response tendencies adhere to Warrick’s, scale-side, and clockwise-to-increase principles. More stereotype consistent responses were obtained for dial-turn questions than for mouse-click questions, implying that the movement of the control may be an important factor when predicting users’ responses based on these three principles. These findings indicate that care must be taken when applying population stereotypes to programs that use mouse-click responses.

Keywords

human factors population stereotypes Warrick’s principle scale-side principle clockwise-to-increase principle control-display configurations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Courtney, A.J.: The effect of scale0side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Ergon. 37, 865–877 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergum, B.O., Bergum, J.E.: Population Stereotypes: An attempt to measure and define. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, pp. 662–665. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica (1981)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan, A.S., Shum, V.Y., Law, H.W., Hui, I.K.: Precise effects of control position, indicator type and scale side on human performance. International J. of Adv. Manufacturing Tech. 22, 380–386 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loveless, N.E.: Direction of motion stereotypes, a review. Ergon. 5, 357–383 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Courtney, A.J.: Hong Kong Chinese direction-of-control stereotypes. Ergon. 37, 417–426 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petropoulos, H., Brebner, J.: Stereotypes for direction-of-movement of rotary controls associated with linear displays: the effects of scale presence and position, of pointer direction, and distances between the control and the display. Ergon. 24, 43–151 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wong, C.K., Lyman, J.: American and Japanese control-display stereotypes: possible implications for design of space station systems. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, pp. 30–34. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffman, E.R.: Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes—linear displays with rotary controls. Ergon. 40, 199–222 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Courtney, A.J.: Control-Display Stereotypes for Multicultural User Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 22, 681–687 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff Wiebe
    • 1
  • Kim-Phuong L. Vu
    • 2
  1. 1.DISH Network Services, L.L.C.EnglewoodUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State University, Long BeachLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations