Advertisement

The Ontological Level: Revisiting 30 Years of Knowledge Representation

  • Nicola Guarino
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5600)

Abstract

I revisit here the motivations and the main proposal of paper I published at the 1994 Wittgenstein Symposium, entitled “The Ontological Level”, in the light of the main results achieved in the latest 30 years of Knowledge Representation, since the well known “What’s in a link?” paper by Bill Woods. I will argue that, despite the explosion of ontologies, many problems are still there, since there is no general agreement about having ontological distinctions built in the representation language, so that assumptions concerning the basic constructs of representation languages remain implicit in the mind of the knowledge engineer, and difficult to express and to share. I will recap the recent results concerning formal ontological distinctions among unary and binary relations, sketching a basic ontology of meta-level categories representation languages should be aware of, and I will discuss the role of such distinctions in the current practice of knowledge engineering.

Keywords

ontology knowledge representation identity rigidity OntoClean 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen, W., Menzel, C.: Modal Rigidity in the OntoClean Methodology. In: Vieu, L., Varzi, A. (eds.) Formal Ontology and Information Systems: Collected Papers from the Fifth International Conference, pp. 119–127. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Artale, A., Franconi, E., Guarino, N., Pazzi, L.: Part-Whole Relations in Object-Centered Systems: an Overview. Data & Knowledge Engineering 20(3), 347–383 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H.: Roles, an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Applied Ontology 2(2), 81–88 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brachman, R.J.: On the Epistemological Status of Semantic Networks. In: Findler, N.V. (ed.) Associative Networks: Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers. Academic Press, London (1979)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brachman, R., Fikes, R., Levesque, H.: Krypton: A Functional Approach to Knowledge Representation. IEEE Computer 116(10), 67–73 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brachman, R., Levesque, H.: Competence in Knowledge Representation. In: Proceedings of National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1982), Pittsburgh, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 189–192 (1982)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brachman, R.J., Schmolze, J.G.: An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System. Cognitive Science 9, 171–216 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carrara, M., Giaretta, P., Morato, V., Soavi, M., Spolaore, G.: Identity and Modality in OntoClean. In: Vieu, L., Varzi, A. (eds.) Formal Ontology and Information Systems: Collected Papers from the Fifth International Conference, pp. 128–139. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Casati, R., Varzi, A.: Parts and Places. The Structure of Spatial Representation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, P.: The entity-relationship model: Towards a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1) (1976)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis, R., Shrobe, H., et al.: What is in a Knowledge Representation? AI Magazine (Spring 1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fine, K.: Ontological Dependence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95, 269–290 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Genesereth, M.R., Nilsson, N.J.: Logical Foundation of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (1987)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grandy: Sortals. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grenon, P.: On Relations. PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Geneve (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guarino, N.: Concepts, Attributes and Arbitrary Relations: Some Linguistic and Ontological Criteria for Structuring Knowledge Bases. Data and Knowledge Engineering 8, 249–261 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guarino, N.: The Ontological Level. In: Casati, R., Smith, B., White, G. (eds.) Philosophy and the Cognitive Science, pp. 443–456. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guarino, N., Carrara, M., Giaretta, P.: An Ontology of Meta-Level Categories. In: Sandewall, D.J.E., Torasso, P. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (KR 1994), pp. 270–280. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guarino, N., Welty, C.: A Formal Ontology of Properties. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS, vol. 1937, pp. 97–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Identity and subsumption. In: Green, R., Bean, C., Myaeng, S. (eds.) The Semantics of Relationships: an Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 111–126. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM 45(2), 61–65 (2002b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What is an Ontology? In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, 2nd edn., pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., Guarino, N., van Sinderen, M.: An Ontologically Well-Founded Profile for UML Conceptual Models. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 112–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. Telematica Instituut Fundamental Research Series 15 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gupta, A.: The Logic of Common Nouns: An Investigation in Quantified Modal Logic. Yale University Press, New Haven (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hirsch, E.: Dividing Reality. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hobbs, J.R.: Ontological Promiscuity. In: Proceedings of 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 1985), Chicago, IL, pp. 61–69 (1985)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kaplan, A.: Towards a Consistent Logical Framework for Ontological Analysis. In: Welty, C., Smith, B. (eds.) Proceedings of FOIS 2001, pp. 244–255. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2001)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lowe, E.J.: Entity, Identity, and Unity. Erkenntnis 48, 191–208 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies and the DOLCE ontology. WonderWeb Deliverable, D17 (2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Masolo, C., Vieu, L., Bottazzi, E., Catenacci, C., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N.: Social Roles and their Descriptions. In: Proceedings of 9th Intl. Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004), Whistler, Canada, pp. 267–277 (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Simons, P.: Parts: a Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1987)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Varzi, A.: A note on the transitivity of parthood. Applied Ontology 1(2), 141–146 (2006)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vieu, L.: On the transitivity of functional parthood. Applied Ontology 1(2), 147–155 (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vieu, L., Borgo, S., Masolo, C.: Artefacts and Roles: Modelling Strategies in a Multiplicative Ontology. In: Proceedings of FOIS 2008, Saarbruecken, Germany. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Welty, C., Andersen, W.: Towards OntoClean 2.0: A framework for rigidity. Applied Ontology 1(1), 107–116 (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Winston, M., Chaffin, R., Herrmann, D.: A Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations. Cognitive Science 11, 417–444 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Woods, W.A.: What’s in a Link: Foundations for Semantic Networks. In: Bobrow, D.G., Collins, A.M. (eds.) Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. Academic Press, London (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Guarino
    • 1
  1. 1.ISTC-CNRLaboratory for Applied OntologyTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations