ICCSA 2009: Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2009 pp 204-211 | Cite as
Security Weakness in a Provable Secure Authentication Protocol Given Forward Secure Session Key
Conference paper
Abstract
Shi, Jang and Yoo recently proposed a provable secure key distribution and authentication protocol between user, service provider and key distribution center(KDC). The protocol was based on symmetric cryptosystem, challenge-response, Diffie-Hellman component and hash function. Despite the claim of provable security, the protocol is in fact insecure in the presence of an active adversary. In this paper, we present the imperfection of Shi et al.’s protocol and suggest modifications to the protocol which would resolve the problem.
Keywords
Cryptography Key distribution Authentication Known key attack Provable securityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Smith, J., Weingarten, F.: Report from the Workshop on Research Directions for NGI. Research challenges for the next generation internet (2007)Google Scholar
- 2.Mitchell, C.: Security for Mobility. IEE press (2004)Google Scholar
- 3.Kohl, J., Neuman, C.: The Kerberos network authentication service(v5). Internet Request for Comments 1510 (1993)Google Scholar
- 4.Bellovin, S., Merritt, M.: Limitations of the Kerboros authentication system. ACM communications review 20, 119–132 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Neuman, B.C., Ts’o, T.: An authentication service for computer networks. IEEE communications 32, 33–38 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kao, I., Chow, R.: An efficient and secure authentication protocol using uncertified keys. ACM Operating Systems Review 29, 14–21 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ganesan, R.: Yaksha: augmenting Kerberos with public key cryptography. In: Proceedings of symposium on Network and Distributed System Security(SNDSS 1995), pp. 132–143. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fox, A., Gribble, S.: Security on the movie: indirect authentication using Kerberos. In: Proceedings of the second annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 154–164. ACM press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
- 9.Sirbu, M., Chuang, J.: Distrbuted authentication in Kerberos using public key cryptography. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Network and Distributed System Security, pp. 134–141. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1997)Google Scholar
- 10.Shieh, S., Ho, F., Huang, Y.: An efficient authentication protocol for mobile networks. Journal of Information Science and Engineering 15, 505–520 (1999)Google Scholar
- 11.SamaraKoon, M., Honary, B.: Novel authentication and key agreement protocol for low processing power and systems resource requirements in portable communications systems. IEE Colloquium on novel DSP Algorithms and Architectures for Radio Systems, pp. 9/1–9/5 (1999)Google Scholar
- 12.Chien, H., Jan, J.: A hybrid authentication protocol for large mobile networks. Journal of Systems and software 67, 123–137 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Yacobi, Y.: A key distribution paradox. In: Menezes, A., Vanstone, S.A. (eds.) CRYPTO 1990. LNCS, vol. 537, pp. 268–273. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)Google Scholar
- 14.Bellare, M., Rogaway, P.: Entity Authentication and key distribution. In: Stinson, D.R. (ed.) CRYPTO 1993. LNCS, vol. 773, pp. 232–249. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Nyberg, K., Rueppel, R.: Weaknesses in some recent key agreement protocols. Electronics Letters 30, 26–27 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Tang, Q., Mitchell, C.: Cryptanalysis of a hybrid authentication protocol for large mobile networks. The journal of systems and software 79, 496–501 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Shi, W., Jang, I., Yoo, H.: A provable secure authentication protocol given forward secure session key. In: Zhang, Y., Yu, G., Bertino, E., Xu, G. (eds.) APWeb 2008. LNCS, vol. 4976, pp. 309–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hwang, R., Su, F.: A new efficient authentication protocol for mobile networks. Computer Standards & Interfaces 28, 241–252 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009