Advertisement

Average-Case Analysis of Perfect Sorting by Reversals

  • Mathilde Bouvel
  • Cedric Chauve
  • Marni Mishna
  • Dominique Rossin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5577)

Abstract

A sequence of reversals that takes a signed permutation to the identity is perfect if it preserves all common intervals between the permutation and the identity. The problem of computing a parsimonious perfect sequence of reversals is believed to be NP-hard, as the more general problem of sorting a signed permutation by reversals while preserving a given subset of common intervals is NP-hard. The only published algorithms that compute a parsimonious perfect reversals sequence have an exponential time complexity. Here we show that, despite this worst-case analysis, with probability one, sorting can be done in polynomial time. Further, we find asymptotic expressions for the average length and number of reversals in commuting permutations, an interesting sub-class of signed permutations.

Keywords

Internal Vertex Prime Vertex Prime Node Identity Permutation Common Interval 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albert, M.H., Atkinson, M.D.: Simple permutations and pattern restricted permutations. Discrete Math. 300, 1–15 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albert, M., Atkinson, M., Klazar, M.: The enumeration of simple permutations. J. Integer Seq. 4, 03.4.4 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bérard, S., Bergeron, A., Chauve, C.: Conservation of combinatorial structures in evolution scenarios. In: Lagergren, J. (ed.) RECOMB-WS 2004. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 3388, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bérard, S., Bergeron, A., Chauve, C., Paul, C.: Perfect sorting by reversals is not always difficult. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 4, 4–16 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bérard, S., Chauve, C., Paul, C.: A more efficient algorithm for perfect sorting by reversals. Inform. Proc. Letters 106, 90–95 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bérard, S., Chauve, C., Paul, C., Tannier, E.: Perfect DCJ rearrangement. In: Nelson, C.E., Vialette, S. (eds.) RECOMB-CG 2008. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 5267, pp. 158–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bergeron, A., Chauve, C., de Montgolfier, F., Raffinot, M.: Computing common intervals of k permutations, with applications to modular decomposition of graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 22, 1022–1039 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergeron, A., Mixtacki, J., Stoye, J.: The inversion distance problem. In: Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bourque, G., Pevzner, P.: Genome-scale evolution: reconstructing gene orders in the ancestral species. Genome Res. 12, 26–36 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chauve, C., Tannier, E.: A methodological framework for the reconstruction of contiguous regions of ancestral genomes and its application to mammalian. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000234 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diekmann, Y., Sagot, M.-F., Tannier, E.: Evolution under reversals: Parsimony and conservation of common intervals. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 4, 301–309 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Figeac, M., Varré, J.-S.: Sorting by reversals with common intervals. In: Jonassen, I., Kim, J. (eds.) WABI 2004. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 3240, pp. 26–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flajolet, P., Sedgewick, R.: Analytic Combinatorics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hannenhalli, S., Pevzner, P.A.: Transforming cabbage into turnip: Polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals. J. ACM 46, 1–27 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibarra, L.: Finding pattern matchings for permutations. Inform. Proc. Letters 61, 293–295 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Landau, G.M., Parida, L., Weimann, O.: Gene proximity analysis across whole genomes via PQ trees. J. Comput. Biol. 12, 1289–1306 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lefebvre, J.-F., El-Mabrouk, N., Tillier, E.R.M., Sankoff, D.: Detection and validation of single gene inversions. Bioinformatics, i190–i196 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sloane, N.J.A.: The on-line encyclopedia of integer sequences (2007), Published electronically, http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/
  19. 19.
    Swenson, K., Lin, Y., Rajan, V., Moret, B.: Hurdles hardly have to be heeded. In: Nelson, C.E., Vialette, S. (eds.) RECOMB-CG 2008. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 5267, pp. 241–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tannier, E., Bergeron, A., Sagot, M.-F.: Advances on sorting by reversals. Discrete Appl. Math. 155, 881–888 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilson, D.B., Greenberg, D.S., Phillips, C.A.: Beyond islands: runs in clone-probe matrices. In: RECOMB 1997, pp. 320–329. ACM Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xu, W.: The distribution of distances between randomly constructed genomes: Generating function, expectation, variance and limits. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 6, 23–36 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu, W., Benoît, A., Sankoff, D.: Poisson adjacency distributions in genome comparison: multichromosomal, circular, signed and unsigned cases. Bioinformatics 24, i146–i152 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu, W., Zheng, C., Sankoff, D.: Paths and cycles in breakpoint graph of random multichromosomal genomes. J. Comput. Biol. 14, 423–435 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathilde Bouvel
    • 1
  • Cedric Chauve
    • 2
  • Marni Mishna
    • 2
  • Dominique Rossin
    • 1
  1. 1.CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, LIAFAParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations