Services Supporting Knowledge Maturing in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

  • Ronald Maier
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 301)

Abstract

The hype around Web 2.0 has again sparked tremendous interest in IT-supported knowledge management and technology-enhanced learning in organizations. Although there has been abundant evidence of how to benefit from Web 2.0 technologies, information on how to go about deploying these in small and medium-sized enterprises in a coordinated manner are scarce. Based on the findings of an empirical study and an ethnographically informed study on knowledge maturing, this paper suggests a set of knowledge services to support a series of knowledge actions chained with the help of the knowledge maturing model. This set of services can be used by small and medium-sized enterprises for analyzing IT tools and systems which currently support their employees’ knowledge maturing activities, to foster knowledge cooperation with customers, suppliers and partners in their business environment and to find gaps which can be filled particularly by consuming services over the Web.

Keywords

Knowledge Management Switching Cost Knowledge Worker Knowledge Element Knowledge Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., Machiraju, V.: Web services. Concepts, architectures and applications, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  2. April, K.A.: Guidelines for developing a k-strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management 6(5), 445–456 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M.: Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Braun, S., Schmidt, A., Walter, A., Zacharias, V.: The Ontology Maturing Approach to Collaborative and Work-Integrated Ontology Development: Evaluation Results and Future Directions. In: International Workshop on Emergent Semantics and Ontology Evolution (ESOE), ISWC 2007, Busan/Korea (2007)Google Scholar
  5. Davenport, T.H., Glaser, J.: Just-in-time delivery comes to knowledge management. Harvard Business Review, 5–9 (July 2002)Google Scholar
  6. Davenport, T.H., Jarvenpaa, S.L., Beers, M.C.: Improving knowledge work processes. Sloan Management Review 37(4), 53–65 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. Drucker, P.F.: The age of social transformation. The Atlantic Monthly 274(5), 53–80 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. Grudin, J.: Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: History and focus. IEEE Computer 5(27), 19–26 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hädrich, T.: Situation-oriented Provision of Knowledge Services. PhD Thesis, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., Tierney, T.: What’ s your strategy for managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review, 680–689 (March-April 1999)Google Scholar
  11. Krafzig, D., Banke, K., Slama, D.: Enterprise SOA: Service-oriented architecture best practices, Upper Saddle River (2005)Google Scholar
  12. Maier, R.: Knowledge management systems. Information and communication technologies for knowledge management, 3rd edn., Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  13. Maier, R., Hädrich, T., Peinl, R.: Enterprise knowledge infrastructures, 2nd edn., Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  14. Maier, R., Schmidt, A.: Characterizing Knowledge Maturing. A Conceptual Process Model for Integrating E-Learning and Knowledge Management. In: Proceedings of WM 2007 - 4th Conference on Professional Knowledge Management. Experiences and Visions, Potsdam 2007, pp. 325–333 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Maier, R., Thalmann, S.: Institutionalised collaborative tagging as an instrument for managing maturing learning and knowledge resources. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (IJTEL) 1(1), 70–84 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maslow, A.H.: A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review 50, 370–396 (1943)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ordóñez de Pablos, P.: Knowledge management and organizational learning: Typologies of knowledge strategies in the spanish manufacturing industry from 1995 to 1999. Journal of Knowledge Management 6(1), 52–62 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O‘Reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2005), http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (30.9.2005)
  19. Schmidt, A.: Knowledge Maturing and the Continuity of Context as a Unifying Concept for Integrating Knowledge Management and E-Learning. In: Proceedings of I-KNOW Conference 2005, Graz (2005)Google Scholar
  20. Schultze, U.: A Confessional Account of an Ethnography about Knowledge Work. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1(24), 1–39 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. Siemens, G.: Connectivism: Learning as Network Creation, elearnspace (2005), http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm (last access: 2008/12/12)
  22. Starbuck, W.H.: Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms. Journal of Management Studies 29(6), 713–740 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsui, E.: The role of IT in KM: Where are we now and where are we heading? Journal of Knowledge Management 9(1), 3–6 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watson, R.T.: Data Management. Data Bases & Organizations, 5th edn., New York (2005)Google Scholar
  25. Watson, R.T.: Evolutionary Information Systems. Presentation at the University of Innsbruck (2008)Google Scholar
  26. W3C. Web services glossary (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/ (last access: 2008/12/12)
  27. Wolff, E.N.: The growth of information workers. Communications of the ACM 48(10), 37–42 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zacharias, V., Braun, S., Schmidt, A.: Social Semantic Bookmarking with SOBOLEO. In: Murugesan, S. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Web 2.0, 3.0 and X.0: Technologies, Business, and Social Applications (2009)Google Scholar
  29. Zack, M.H.: Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review 41(3), 125–145 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Maier
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management, Information SystemsUniversity of InnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations