The Performance of Two Deformable Shape Models in the Context of the Face Recognition

  • Adam Schmidt
  • Andrzej Kasinski
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5337)

Abstract

In this paper we compare the performance of face recognition systems based on two deformable shape models and on three classification approaches. Face contours have been extracted by using two methods: the Active Shapes and the Bayesian Tangent Shapes. The Normal Bayes Classifiers and the Minimum Distance Classifiers (based on the Euclidean and Mahalanobis metrics) have been designed and then compared w.r.t. the face recognition efficiency. The influence of the parameters of the shape extraction algorithms on the efficiency of classifiers has been investigated. The proposed classifiers have been tested both in the controlled conditions and as a part of the automatic face recognition system.

Keywords

face recognition active shapes normal bayes classifiers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision 1(4), 321–331 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cootes, T., Taylor, C.: Statistical models of appearance for computer vision. Technical report, University of Manchester, Wolfson Image Analysis Unit, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cootes, T., Cooper, D., Taylor, C., Graham, J.: Active shape models - their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61(1), 38–59 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cootes, T.: Image Processing and Analysis, Chapter Model-Based Methods in Analysis of Biomedical Images. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao, M., Li, S.Z., Chen, C., Bu, J.: Shape Evaluation for Weighted Active Shape Models. In: Proc. of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1074–1079 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zuo, F., de With, P.H.N.: Fast facial feature extraction using a deformable shape model with haar-wavelet based local texture attributes. In: Proc. of ICIP 2004, pp. 1425–1428 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ge, X., Yang, J., Zheng, Z., Li, F.: Multi-view based face chin contour extraction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 19, 545–555 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wan, K.-W., Lam, K.-M., Ng, K.-C.: An accurate active shape model for facial feature extraction. Pattern Recognition Letters 26(15), 2409–2423 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou, Y., Gu, L., Zhang, H.: Bayesian tangent shape model: Estimating shape and pose parameters via bayesian inference. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K.: Pattern Recognition, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Kasinski, A., Schmidt, A.: The Architecture of the Face and Eyes Detection System Based on Cascade Classifiers. In: Computer Recognition Systems 2. Advances in Soft Computing, vol. 45. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt, A., Kasinski, A.: The Performance of the Haar Cascade Classifiers Applied to the Face and Eyes Detection. In: Computer Recognition Systems 2. Advances in Soft Computing, vol. 45. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Schmidt
    • 1
  • Andrzej Kasinski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Control and Information EngineeringPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations