How Users Perceive and Appraise Personalized Recommendations
Traditional websites have long relied on users revealing their preferences explicitly through direct manipulation interfaces. However recent recommender systems have gone as far as using implicit feedback indicators to understand users’ interests. More than a decade after the emergence of recommender systems, the question whether users prefer them compared to stating their preferences explicitly, largely remains a subject of study. Even though some studies were found on users’ acceptance and perceptions of this technology, these were general marketing-oriented surveys. In this paper we report an in-depth user study comparing Amazon’s implicit book recommender with a baseline model of explicit search and browse. We address not only the question “do people accept recommender systems” but also how or under what circumstances they do and more importantly, what can still be improved.
KeywordsRecommender System Collaborative Filter User Perceive Recommendation Quality Implicit Rating
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Choicestream personalization survey (2007), http://www.choicestream.com/
- 2.Chen, L., Pu, P.: Evaluating critiquing-based recommender agents. In: AAAI (2006)Google Scholar
- 7.Nichols, D.M.: Implicit rating and filtering. In: Proceedings of the Fifth DELOS Workshop on Filtering and Collaborative Filtering, pp. 31–36 (1997)Google Scholar
- 9.Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstorm, P., Riedl, J.: GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews. In: Proc. of ACM CSCW 2004, pp. 175–186. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
- 10.Shapira, B., Taieb-Maimon, M., Moskowitz, A.: Study of the usefulness of known and new implicit indicators and their optimal combination for accurate inference of users interests. In: SAC 2006, ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
- 12.Swearingen, K., Sinha, R.: Beyond algorithms: An hci perspective on recommender systems (2001)Google Scholar