What Do Academic Users Really Want from an Adaptive Learning System?

  • Martin Harrigan
  • Miloš Kravčík
  • Christina Steiner
  • Vincent Wade
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5535)

Abstract

When developing an Adaptive Learning System (ALS), users are generally consulted (if at all) towards the end of the development cycle. This can limit users’ feedback to the characteristics and idiosyncrasies of the system at hand. It can be difficult to extrapolate principles and requirements, common to all ALSs, that are rated highly by users. To address this problem, we have elicited requirements from learners and teachers across several European academic institutions through explorative, semi-structured interviews [1]. The goal was to provide a methodology and an appropriate set of questions for conducting such interviews and to capture the essential requirements for the early iterations of an ALS design. In this paper we describe the methodology we employed while preparing, conducting, and analyzing the interviews and we present our findings along with objective and subjective analysis.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goguen, J., Linde, C.: Techniques for Requirements Elicitation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE 1993), pp. 152–164 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frosch-Wilke, D., Sanchez-Alonso, S.: Composing Adaptive Learning Systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006), pp. 360–362. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tseng, J., Chu, H., Hwang, G., Tsai, C.: Development of an Adaptive Learning System with Two Sources of Personalization Information. Computers and Education 51(2), 776–786 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ortigosa, A., Carro, R.: The Continuous Empirical Evaluation Approach: Evaluating Adaptive Web-Based Courses. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A.T., de Rosis, F. (eds.) UM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2702, p. 146. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paramythis, A., Weibelzahl, S.: A Decomposition Model for the Layered Evaluation of Interactive Adaptive Systems. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3538, pp. 438–442. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hauger, D., Köck, M.: State of the Art of Adaptivity in E-Learning Platforms. In: Workshop Adaptivität und Benutzermodellierung in interactiven Systemen, ABIS 2007 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Harrigan
    • 1
  • Miloš Kravčík
    • 2
  • Christina Steiner
    • 3
  • Vincent Wade
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceTrinity College DublinIreland
  2. 2.Open Universiteit NederlandThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GrazAustria

Personalised recommendations