A Reflective Middleware to Support Peer-to-Peer Overlay Adaptation

  • Gareth Tyson
  • Paul Grace
  • Andreas Mauthe
  • Gordon Blair
  • Sebastian Kaune
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5523)

Abstract

As peer-to-peer systems are evolving from simplistic application specific overlays to middleware platforms hosting a range of potential applications it has become evident that increasingly configurable approaches are required to ensure appropriate overlay support is provided for divergent applications. This is exacerbated by the increasing heterogeneity of networked devices expected to host the overlay. Traditional adaptation approaches rely on simplistic design-time isolated fine-tuning of overlay operations. This, however, cannot fully support the level of configurability required by next generation peer-to-peer systems. To remedy this, a middleware overlay framework is designed that promotes the use of architectural reconfiguration for adaptive purposes. Underpinning this is a generic reusable component pattern that utilises software reflection to enable rich and extensible adaptation of overlays beneath divergent applications operating in heterogeneous environments. This is evaluated through a number of case-study experiments showing how overlays developed using the framework have been adapted to address a range of application and environmental variations.

Keywords

Adaptation peer-to-peer reflective middleware 

References

  1. 1.
    Bianchi, S., Serbu, S., Felber, P., Kropf, P.: Adaptive Load Balancing for DHT Lookups. In: Proc. Intl. Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, Arlington, Virginia (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Blair, G.S., Coulson, G., Andersen, A., Blair, L., Clarke, M., Costa, F., Duran-Limon, H., Fitzpatrick, T., Johnston, L., Moreira, R., Parlavantzas, N., Saikoski, K.: The Design and Implementation of Open ORB V2. In: IEEE Distributed Systems Online (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brampton, A., MacQuire, A., Rai, I.A., Race, N.J., Mathy, L.: Stealth Distributed Hash Table: A Robust and Flexible Super-Peered DHT. In: Proc. ACM CoNext, Lisbon, Portugal (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruneton, E., Coupaye, T., Leclerc, M., Quema, V., Stefani, J.-B.: An Open Component Model and its Support in Java. In: Proc. Intl. Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering Edinburgh, Scotland (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chawathe, Y., Ratnasamy, S., Breslau, L., Lanham, N., Shenker, S.: Making Gnutella-like P2P Systems Scalable. In: Proc. SIGCOMM, Germany (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coulson, G.: A Configurable Multimedia Middleware Platform. IEEE Multimedia Magazine 6(1), 62–76 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coulson, G., Blair, G., Grace, P., Joolia, A., Lee, K., Ueyama, J., Sivaharan, T.: A Generic Component Model for Building Systems Software. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 27(1), 1–42 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dabek, F., Zhao, B., Druschel, P., Stoica, I.: Towards a common API for structured peer-to-peer overlays. In: Proc. IPTPS, Berkeley, CA (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Ganesh, A., Kermarrec, A., Massoulie, L.: SCAMP: Peer-to-peer lightweight membership service for large-scale group communication. In: Crowcroft, J., Hofmann, M. (eds.) NGC 2001. LNCS, vol. 2233, p. 44. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grace, P., Coulson, G., Blair, G., Mathy, L., Yeung, W., Cai, W., Duce, D., Cooper, C.: GridKit: Pluggable Overlay Networks for Grid Computing. In: Proc. Intl. Symposium on Distributed Objects and Applications, Larnaca, Cyprus (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gu, X., Nahrstedt, K., Yu, B.: SpiderNet: An Integrated Peer-to-Peer Service Composition Framework. In: Proc. 13th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, Honolulu, HA (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hughes, D.: AdaPtP - a Framework for Building Adaptable Peer-to-Peer Systems. PhD Thesis, Lancaster University (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hughes, D., Coulson, G., Warren, I.: A Framework for Developing Reflective and Dynamic Peer-to-Peer Networks (RaDP2P). In: Proc. 4th IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing, Zurich, Switzerland (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kon, F., Costa, F., Blair, G., Campbell, R.H.: The Case for Reflective Middleware. Commun. ACM 45(6), 33–38 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mathy, L., Canonico, R., Hutchinson, D.: An Overlay Tree Building Control Protocol. In: Proc. Intl. Workshop on Group Communications, London, UK (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maymounkov, P., Mazières, D.: A Peer-to-Peer Information System Based on the XOR Metric. In: Druschel, P., Kaashoek, M.F., Rowstron, A. (eds.) IPTPS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2429, p. 53. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oreizy, P., Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: Architecture-based runtime software evolution. In: Proc. Intl. Conference on Software Engineering Kyoto, Japan (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Portmann, M., Ardon, S., Senac, P.: Seneviratne, PROST: A Programmable Structured Peer-to-Peer Overlay Network. In: Proc. Intl. Conference on Peer-To-Peer Computing, Zurich, Switzerland (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rowstron, A., Druschel, P.: Pastry: Scalable, Distributed Object Location and Routing for Large-scale Peer-to-Peer Systems. In: Guerraoui, R. (ed.) Middleware 2001. LNCS, vol. 2218, p. 329. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, R.D., Kaashoek, M., Balakarishnan, H.: Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-Peer Lookup Service for Internet Applications. In: Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, San Diego (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tyson, G.: Component Based Overlay Development in Gridkit. M.Sc Thesis, Lancaster University, http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/~tysong/
  24. 24.
    Tyson, G., Mauthe, A., Plagemann, T., El-khatib, Y.: Juno: Reconfigurable Middleware for Heterogeneous Content Networking. In: Proc. 5th Intl. Workshop on Next Generation Networking Middleware (NGNM), Samos Islands, Greece (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, X., Liu, J., Li, B., Yum, T.S.P.: CoolStreaming: A Data-driven Overlay Network for Live Media Streaming. In: Proc. IEEE Infocom, Miami, FL (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gareth Tyson
    • 1
  • Paul Grace
    • 1
  • Andreas Mauthe
    • 1
  • Gordon Blair
    • 1
  • Sebastian Kaune
    • 2
  1. 1.ComputingDepartment, InfoLab21Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.KOM Multimedia CommunicationsTechnishe Universität DarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations