Advertisement

Ontology Evolution with Evolva

  • Fouad Zablith
  • Marta Sabou
  • Mathieu d’Aquin
  • Enrico Motta
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5554)

Abstract

Ontology evolution is a painstaking and time-consuming process, especially in information rich and dynamic domains. While ontology evolution refers both to the adaptation of ontologies (e.g., through additions or updates possibly discovered from external data sources) and the management of these changes, no existing tools offer both functionalities. The Evolva framework aims to be a blueprint for a comprehensive ontology evolution tool that would cover both tasks. Additionally, Evolva proposes the use of background knowledge sources to reduce user involvement in the ontology adaptation step. This demo focuses on the initial, concrete implementation of our framework.

Keywords

Text Document Evolva Framework Relation Discovery Ontology Concept Ontology Evolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Alani, H., Harris, S., O’Neil, B.: Winnowing ontologies based on application use. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 185–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloehdorn, S., Haase, P., Sure, Y., Voelker, J.: Ontology Evolution, pp. 51–70. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen, W.W., Ravikumar, P., Fienberg, S.E.: A comparison of string distance metrics for name-matching tasks. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Information Integration on the Web (IIWeb 2003) (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haase, P., Stojanovic, L.: Consistent evolution of OWL ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 182–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klein, M.: Change Management for Distributed Ontologies. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Novacek, V., Laera, L., Handschuh, S.: Semi-automatic integration of learned ontologies into a collaborative framework. In: IWOD (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noy, N.F., Chugh, A., Liu, W., Musen, M.A.: A framework for ontology evolution in collaborative environments. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 544–558. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sabou, M., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: Exploring the Semantic Web as Background Knowledge for Ontology Matching. Journal on Data Semantics XI (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stojanovic, L.: Methods and Tools for Ontology Evolution. PhD thesis, FZI (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vrandecic, D., Pinto, H.S., Sure, Y., Tempich, C.: The DILIGENT knowledge processes. Journal of Knowledge Management 9, 85–96 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zablith, F.: Dynamic ontology evolution. ISWC Doctoral Consortium (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zablith, F., Sabou, M., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: Using background knowledge for ontology evolution. In: IWOD Workshop at ISWC (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fouad Zablith
    • 1
  • Marta Sabou
    • 1
  • Mathieu d’Aquin
    • 1
  • Enrico Motta
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Media Institute (KMi)The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations