Evaluation of Automated Guided Vehicle Systems for Container Terminals Using Multi Agent Based Simulation

  • Lawrence Henesey
  • Paul Davidsson
  • Jan A. Persson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5269)


Due to globalization and the growth of international trade, many container terminals are trying to improve performance in order to keep up with demand. One technology that has been proposed is the use of Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) in the handling of containers within terminals. Recently, a new generation of AGVs has been developed which makes use of cassettes that can be detached from the AGV. We have developed an agent-based simulator for evaluating the cassette-based system and comparing it to a more traditional AGV system. In addition, a number of different configurations of container terminal equipment, e.g., number of AGVs and cassettes, have been studied in order to find the most efficient configuration. The simulation results suggest that there are configurations in which the cassette-based system is more cost efficient than a traditional AGV system, as well as confirming that multi agent based simulation is a promising approach to this type of applications.


MABS application automated guided vehicles container terminal 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Davidson, N.: A global capacity assessment and needs analysis. In: 39th Terminal Operating Conference. Informa Plc., Antwerp (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parunak, H.V.D., Savit, R., Riolo, R.L.: Agent-Based Modeling vs. Equation-Based Modeling: A Case Study and Users’ Guide. In: Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., Gilbert, N. (eds.) MABS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1534, pp. 10–26. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ioannou, P.A., Kosmatopoulos, E.B., Jula, H., Collinge, A., Liu, C.-I., Asef-Vaziri, A.: Cargo Handling Technologies. Technical Report. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California: Los Angeles, pp. 1–147 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vis, I.F.A.: Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems. European Journal of Operational Research 170(3), 677–709 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    TTS AB Port Equipment,
  6. 6.
    Bruzzone, A.G., Giribone, P., Revetria, R.: Operative requirements and advances for the new generation simulators in mulitmodal container terminals. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference. Society for Computer Simulation International (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayuth, Y., Pollatschek, M.A., Roll, Y.: Building a Port Simulator. Simulation 63(3), 179–189 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Law, A.M., Kelton, W.D.: Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill International, Boston (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rida, M., Boulmakoul, A., Laurini, R.: Calibration and validation of container terminal simulation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology, pp. 774–777 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Monie, G.: Environmental Scanning in Ports. In: ITMMA Private Public Partnerships in Ports, Antwerp, Belgium (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henesey, L., Davidsson, P., Persson, J.A.: Agent Based Simulation Architecture for Evaluating Operational Policies in Transshipping Containers. In: Fischer, K., Timm, I.J., André, E., Zhong, N. (eds.) MATES 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4196, pp. 73–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vis, I.F.A.: A comparative analysis of storage and retrieval equipment at a container terminal. International Journal of Production Economics 103(2), 680–693 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elder, M.: Simulation beats Queuing, SIMUL8 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Clearwater, S.H.: Market-Based Control: A Paradigm for Distributed Resource Allocation. World Scientific, Singapore (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Law, A.M., Kelton, W.D.: Simulation Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill International, Boston (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vis, I.F.A., de Koster, R., Savelsbergh, M.W.P.: Minimum vehicle fleet size under time-window constraints at a container terminal. Transportation Science 39(2), 249–260 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence Henesey
    • 1
  • Paul Davidsson
    • 2
  • Jan A. Persson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Systems and Software EngineeringBlekinge Institute of TechnologyKarlshamnSweden
  2. 2.Department of Systems and Software EngineeringBlekinge Institute of TechnologyRonnebySweden

Personalised recommendations