Process Capital as Strategic Success Factor: The Lufthansa Example

Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks on Information Systems book series (INFOSYS)

Abstract

The high importance of processes regarding a company’s success has been known for a long time. However, the level of importance of processes, especially in comparison with other success factors, has not been in focus in a consequent matter yet. The research regarding “intangible assets” now provides a new perspective. According to recent research findings, “process capital” is one of the most important assets of a company. In consequence, process capital has to be built up and managed and has to be a major focus of corporate strategy. On the one hand, the process capital can be the basis for strategy development. On the other hand, process capital is essential for strategy implementation. Process capital management (PCM) is the concept that, in addition to a “classical” process management, also focuses on developing and preserving intangible assets. This chapter gives an introduction to process capital. Then, the correlation between process capital and strategy is analyzed. Furthermore, a suggestion is made regarding the further development of process management toward PCM. Finally, the importance of process capital is illustrated by means of a real-life example from Lufthansa.

References

  1. Ahlrichs F, Knuppertz T (2006) Controlling von Geschäftsprozessen: Prozessorientierte Unternehmenssteuerung umsetzen. Schäffer Poeschel, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and contained competitive advantage. J Manage 19(1):99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker J, Kahn D (2003) The process in focus. In: Becker J, Kugeler M, Rosemann M (eds) Process management: a guide for the design of business processes. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  4. Burlton RT (2010) Delivering business strategy through process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandler A (1962) Strategy and structure. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Edvinsson L (2000) Some perspectives on intangibles and intellectual capital 2000. J Intellect Capital 1(1):12–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edvinsson L, Malone MS (1997) Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden roots. HarperBusiness, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Grant RM (2005) Contemporary strategy analysis. Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Günther T, Kirchner-Khairy S, Zurwehme A (2004) Measuring intangible resources for managerial accounting purposes. In: Horvath P, Möller K (eds) Intangibles in der Unternehmenssteuerung. Vahlen, München, pp 159–185Google Scholar
  10. Günther T, Beyer D, Menninger J (2005) Does relevance influence reporting about environmental and intangible success factors ? – Empirical results from a survey of “new economy” executives. Schmalenbach Bus Rev Special Issue 2/05, 101–138Google Scholar
  11. Hammer M (2007) The agenda. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Heckl D, Moormann J (2010) Process performance managment. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  13. Hung R (2000) An empirical examination of the relationship between business process management and business performance: a study of Australia’s top 100 companies. Dissertation, University of Sydney, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  14. Hung RY-Y (2006) Business process management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Total Qual Manage 17(1):21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR (2004) Time-driven activity-based costing. Harv Bus Rev 11:131–138Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) Balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Lev B, Daum JH (2003) Intangible Assets and the need for holistic and more future-oriented approach to enterprise management and corporate reporting. URL=http://www.juergendaum.de/articles/PAPER2010-PMA_IC_symp_lev_daum.pdf
  18. Lev B, Sougiannis T (1999) Penetrating the book-to-market black box: the R&D-effect. J Bus Financ Account 26:419–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayer R (2005) Prozessmanagement: Erfolg durch Steigerung der Prozessperformance. In: Horváth & Partners (ed), Prozessmanagement umsetzen. Schäffer Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  20. Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand B, Lampel J (1998) Strategy safari: a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Neumann S, Probst C, Wernsmann C (2003) Continuous process management. In: Becker J, Kugeler M, Rosemann M (eds) Process management: a guide for the design of business processes. Springer, Berlin, pp 233–250Google Scholar
  22. Osterloh M, Frost J (2006) Prozessmanagement als Kernkompetenz: Wie Sie Business Reengineering strategisch nutzen können. Gabler Verlag, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Porter ME (1998) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Prahalad CG, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harv Bus Rev 3:79–91Google Scholar
  25. Rockart JF (1979) Chief executives define their own data needs. Harv Bus Rev 57(2):81–93Google Scholar
  26. van der Aalst WMP, Donger B, van Herbst J, Maruster L, Schimm G, Weijters A (2003) Workflow mining: a survey of issues and approaches. Data Knowl Eng 47(2):237–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. WGARIA (working group “Accounting and Reporting of Intangible Assets” of the Schmalenbach Gesellschaft) (2005) Corporate Reporting on Intangibles – A Proposal from a German Background, in: Schmalenbach Business Review (2):65–100Google Scholar
  28. Wang XZ (1999) Data mining and knowledge discovery for process monitoring and control. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yin RK (2008) Case study research – design and methods. Sage, Thousands Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Horváth and Partners Management ConsultantsStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations