Advertisement

Abstract

Contemporary workflow management systems (WfMS) offer promising perspectives in respect to comprehensive lifecycle support of business processes. However, there still exist numerous business applications with hard-coded process logic. Respective application software is both complex to design and costly to maintain. One major reason for the absence of workflow technology in these applications is the fact that many processes are data-driven; i.e., progress of process instances depends on value changes of data objects. Thus business processes and business data cannot be treated independently from each other, and business process models have to be compliant with the underlying data structure. This paper presents characteristic properties of data-oriented business software, which we gathered in several case studies, and it elaborates to what degree existing WfMS are able to provide the needed object-awareness. We show that the activity-centered paradigm of existing WfMS is too inflexible in this context, and we discuss major requirements needed to enable object-awareness in processes management systems.

Keywords

Workflow Management Object-aware Process Management Systems Data-driven Process Execution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aalst, W., Hee, K.: Workflow-Management - Models, Methods and Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aalst, W., Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.: Workflow patterns. Distr. & Parallel Databases 14, 5–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aalst, W., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case handling: A new paradigm for business process support. DKE 53(2), 129–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Müller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 131–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reijers, H., Liman, S., Aalst, W.: Product-based workflow design. Management Information Systems 20(1), 229–262 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aalst, W., Barthelmess, P., Ellis, C., Wainer, J.: Workflow modeling using proclets. In: Scheuermann, P., Etzion, O. (eds.) CoopIS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1901, pp. 198–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ryndina, K., Küster, J., Gall, H.: Consistency of business process models and object life cycles. In: Kühne, T. (ed.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4364, pp. 80–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Redding, G., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A., Iordachescu, A.: Transforming object-oriented models to process-oriented models. In: ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Benatallah, B., Paik, H.-Y. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4928, pp. 132–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerede, C., Su, J.: Specification and verification of artifact behaviors in business process models. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 181–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M., Sadiq, W., Schulz, K.: When workflows will not deliver: The case of contradicting work practice. In: Proc. BIS 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, R., Bhattacharya, K., Wu, F.: Modeling business contexture and behavior using business artifacts. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 324–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H., Aalst, W.: Product-based workflow support: Dynamic workflow execution. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 571–574. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Müller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: A new paradigm for the enactment and dynamic adaptation of data-driven process structures. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vera Künzle
    • 1
  • Manfred Reichert
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Databases and Information SystemsUlm UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations