Overcoming the First Hurdle: Why Organizations Do Not Adopt CMMI

  • Nazrina Khurshid
  • Paul L. Bannerman
  • Mark Staples
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5543)

Abstract

This paper further examines why some software development organizations decide not to adopt CMMI by replicating an earlier Australian study in another country. The study examines data collected from the efforts of three consulting firms to sell a CMMI Level 2 program subsidized by the Malaysian government. The most frequently cited reasons for not adopting CMMI were: the program was too costly; the companies were unsure of the benefits; the organization was too small; and/or the organization had other priorities. The Malaysian study extends and generally supports the Australian study (differences were found in the frequency ordering of reasons and two new reason categories had to be introduced). It also adds to our understanding of CMMI adoption decisions. Based on the results, we conclude that to achieve broader impact in practice, software process improvement (SPI) researchers need to develop a stronger cost-benefit analysis for SPI, recognising it as a business investment rather than just a product or process quality improvement technique, and provide flexible entry options to enable more companies of difference sizes to take the adoption leap.

Keywords

Software Process Improvement SPI CMMI adoption 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrahamsson, P., Iivari, N.: Commitment in Software Process Improvement: In Search of the Process. In: Proceedings of 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2002), vol. 8. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alstrom, D., Bruton, G.: Turnaround in Asia: What do we know? Asia Pac. J. Manage. 21, 5–24 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baddoo, N., Hall, T.: De-motivators for Software Process Improvement: an Analysis of Practitioners’ Views. J. Syst. & Softw. 66(1), 23–33 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brodman, J.G., Johnson, D.L.: What Small Business and Small Organizations Say about the CMM: Experience Report. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1994), pp. 331–340. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coleman, G., O’Connor, R.: Investigating Software Process in Practice: A Grounded Theory Perspective. J. Syst. & Softw. 81(5), 772–784 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conradi, R., Fuggetta, A.: Improving software process improvement. IEEE Softw. 19(4), 92–99 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fink, D., Laupase, R.: Perceptions of Web Site Design Characteristics: A Malaysian/ Australian Comparison. Internet Res. 10(1), 44–55 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gibson, R.: Software Process Improvement: Innovation and Diffusion. In: Larsen, T.J., McGuire, E. (eds.) Information Systems Innovation and Diffusion: Issues and Directions, pp. 71–87. Idea Group Publishing (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guerrero, F., Eterovic, Y.: Adopting the SW-CMM in Small IT Organizations. IEEE Softw. 21(4), 29–35 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen, B., Rose, J., Tjørnehøj, G.: Prescription, Description, Reflection: The Shape of the Software Process Improvement Field. Int. J. Inform. Manage. 24(6), 457–472 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hersleb, J., Carleton, A., Rozum, J., Siegel, J., Zubrow, D.: Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results. Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-94-TR-013 (August 1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hofstede, G.J.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Humphrey, W.S.: Software Process Improvement – A Personal View: How it Started and Where it is Going. Softw. Process Improv. & Pract. 12(3), 223–227 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehta, C.R., Patel, N.R.: ALGORITHM 643: FEXACT: a FOTRAN Subroutine for Fisher’s Exact Test on Unordered rxc Contingency Tables. ACM Trans. on Math. Softw. 12(2), 154–161 (1986)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    National SME Development Council: Definitions for Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia (2005) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Niazi, M., Ali Babar, M., Katugampola, N.M.: Demotivators of Software Process Improvement: An Empirical Investigation. Softw. Process Improv. & Pract. 13(3), 249–264 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richardson, I., von Wangenheim, C.G.: Why Are Small Software Organizations Different. IEEE Softw. 24(1), 18–22 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shull, F.J., Carver, J.C., Vegas, S., Juristo, N.: The role of replications in Empirical Software Engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13, 211–218 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith, P.B.: Organizational Behaviour and National Culture. Br. J. Manage. 3(1), 39–50 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Staples, M., Niazi, M., Jeffery, R., Abrahams, A., Byatt, P., Murphy, R.: An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI. J Syst. & Softw. 80(6), 883–895 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Staples, M., Niazi, M.: Systematic Review of Organizational Motivations for Adopting CMM-based SPI. Inform. & Softw. Technol. 50(7/8), 605–620 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Trewin, D.: Small Business in Australia: 2001. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1321.0 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wilkie, F.G., Rombach, D., Penn, M.L., Jeffery, R., Herndon, M.A., Konrad, M.: Motivating Small to Medium Sized Enterprises to Adopt Software Process. In: Proceedings of the International Process Research Consortium (October 2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nazrina Khurshid
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul L. Bannerman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mark Staples
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.NICTAAustralian Technology ParkEveleighAustralia
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of NSWAustralia

Personalised recommendations